Ants are a wee small, and too few, but yeah. Same.

Good riddance, murderous cunt.

Why go interactive at this point? Without spoiling anything, I'll say that the sequence acts as a clever framing device for events which occur later in the game. It also, hopefully obviously, hints that there's something not quite right with Spacey's character. Your son's funeral is not the proper place to field a new…

Those t-shirts look really nice.

I read it from wikipedia.
It stated Zenimax were the publishers. Oh well.

Even if it's not the greatest thing since sliced bread, it'll have plenty other quality content.

Aye, but that doesn't really make it a Bethesda game.
They should give some credit to the devs.

Where did you get Bethesda from?

Battlecry Studios is making this game, their very first. And they're a Zenimax studio.

You overestimate the force from the gun.
And using the game as a reference, the thrusters push the soldier faster than a gun would. So yeah, it definitely could.

While I do have more faith in ED I have lots of hope for SC.
I'm not a "fanboi" of anything.
He did also ask if anyone else thought it was the most ambitious game ever. To which my answer is "no".

You come off more as a fanboy than I do with your response.

Maybe, but I think they just want the ship part to be perfect (as much as possible) before they jump on the walking around part.

Explain, please.

It doesn't have it yet.
Frontier, the devs, have a different approach to their development.
They want to have a full fledged space game for ships ready (the current beta has about 2400 solar systems).
So basically, yes, you're just a ship.

There will be expansions later on where you can walk around, land on planets,…

Elite Dangerous will have basically all the same features.
So yeah, it's ambitious, but it's not alone.

That game was a total bummer for me.
When it was most active, my computer wasn't good enough.
Now that I have a good computer it's practically dead.

Not that much, though.

So far Star Citizen is just a bunch of arenas with different activities, with some promises attached.
Let's not get ahead of ourselves.

I have seen it, I've read articles on Kotaku, AND on the other side.
You should do the same.
And why would I be convinced about your side of things because there are people who would disagree with me?
There are just as many who would agree with me. They just don't hang on Kotaku.

And the way you're arguing, repeating…

No, you're trying to prove that Gamergate is all that stuff you say, based on nothing but what you seem to claim as mere observation.
One would think a hategroup would have more hateful comments towards their "targets". And not just a tiny 5 or so per cent.

What you're doing is looking at what the most extreme people…

That's grand coming from someone who hasn't provided any sources, either.