Why would they want to spy on 15 year olds cussing out other people on call of duty?

The only good defense of the Kinect ive seen is "voice control" But why do we need a 100$ camera for that? Why not a built in mic with the controller? Or built into the console itself? Even with full support from Microsoft i still dont think any good games would be made for the thing. Its a nice idea but its clearly…

Spokesperson? u wot m8? Because you sounded so grounded and in the middle on everything. Sounding like a true Xbone fanboy yourself (is it because i said Xbone? i mean some Xbone fans takes Xbone as some sort of negative term.. its just an abbreviation if your confused)

Rushed start for Sony? Have you used a PS4? Its seamless! Microsoft has been the one back tracking on every move since they announced the Xbone. A kinectless xbone is just another back track of theirs. Removing the need to have live to use netflix or other services you pay for separately is yet ANOTHER back track of…

Latios and Latias arent rumors. Hackers found them in the code of the game, and have pictures of them in game to prove it.

I remember reading somewhere that the whole game didnt just disappear. It would just become inactive until you reupped your ps+.

They have plenty of new. It doesnt do as well, give me a new 3D zelda that utilizes the gamepad well and theyd easily move units

RIP wallet. September-November is going to murder you.. :'(

Glitches? What glitches? Most of this shit they put in the game to "make it more realistic" Which most of the time breaks the game. So i mean sure they turn into glitches, but too many were intentional. I cant tell you how many times ive tried to pass to a guy WIDE OPEN in the corner who decides he suddenly wants to…

It says "lol im a total loser whose probably 15 and who finds 69 funny due to my immaturity"? Hows your cawl of dooty?

The 3ds 3d gimmick is just that, a gimmick. I prefer to never even touch the 3d slider, i might occasionally turn it on for a new game just to see how it looks.. but i usually turn it off after a few minutes.

See i only play multiplayer and the modern/future setting is getting extremely old in multiplayer.

Eh from what i saw 40$ is too big of a risk for me. Ill wait for reviews, playthroughs and if that impresses me ill wait for it to go on sale at 20-30$.

Idk, the combat gameplay ive seen so far seems clunky and a bit floaty. It might be different once its in my hands but i think ill wait on this one...

Is it hard to stay "stylized graphics"? Not every game needs to have "OH WOW KABLAM IN YOUR FACE FANCY 1080p 60 FRAMES OMWOWZERSGEEZUS" graphics. I hate when people look at more anime inspired or even pixel art and instantly pin it with "shitty/out of date" graphics.

Exactly. Its all about money, and a wwii or korean or any other time frame wouldnt sell well enough to the kiddies who would say its boring.

Well you need to look at the fact that im talking about making a ww1 or 2 time frame game. So mw1 2 and 3 would then still be considered "future" in comparison.

Thats not my point.. like at all.

A modern graphic WWI or WWII game hasnt been done. The ones that were done were still very muddy(pun not intended) and never really looked good. Sorry but there isnt much difference in the modern warfare series to black ops 2 to ghosts. Its all just modern cities destroyed, thats pretty much every map. The guns also…

Changes? Its pretty much been the same game since modern warfare just with different robot kill streaks