Battleship != Destroyer. The headline lead me to believe I'd see a monstrous gun platform, and I was sadly disappointed.
Battleship != Destroyer. The headline lead me to believe I'd see a monstrous gun platform, and I was sadly disappointed.
You can. Mouseover the poster's name/icon and you get a heart to click.
You should check out the award winning documentary American Harmony, also on Netflix streaming. http://www.americanharmonythemovie.com http://www.facebook.com/americanharmony
Right, because São Paulo is totally not dangerous, and anybody with enough money/status to be a kidnapping target doesn't drive around in a bulletproof car, and there aren't similar gunfights in the streets, and it isn't the city with the highest density of helicopter pads in the world because anyone who can afford it…
See Mythbusters for the relevant airplane experiment. It takes an initial hole of a few square feet to cause a catastrophic structural blowout. Bullet holes don't do it.
You people are so tragically hip, it not even funny. When you want to graduate to a bag that actually keeps your multi-thousand dollar laptop safe and allows you to work in harsh environments, look no further than the Higher Ground Trillium (formerly the Back Office by Shaun Jackson Design):
SQL injections don't take talent. It's trivial, and only works when the target is too stupid to have implemented input validation to check for SQL queries in input fields.
*Howard The Duck 2*
You really should read Heinlein's "Time Enough For Love".
COTD. Seriously.
Betty must have gained a lot of weight, then. Oh, wait, that was Rosie O'Donnell. Didn't know she was turning tricks...
Silent Running was an awesome predecessor of Moon. Watch both.
You've clearly never listened to Degrasse Tyson's description of spaghettification.
That won't help if they're carnies.
How long before we have constant acceleration vehicles (even at low accelerations like 1/16 or 1/8G), so we can get around the solar system far faster than we do now? From what I've read, we have the technology now to do it, even with chemical rockets.
Nor anybody with a double-penis name.
Brings back memories of being an extra on Teen Wolf Too. True story.
Why doesn't NASA use constant acceleration/deceleration when flying to someplace like Mars. From what I've read, we've already got existing technology to push 1/16G or even 1/8G on a constant acceleration vehicle, which would cut the trip to Mars by a ton. If you pushed it to 1G (which might not really be feasible due…
Do you not read Gizmodo? There was already a whole post on that.
Here is the most telling line of the email, in terms of the underlying reason why there was utter crap being produced: