It doesn’t matter that she’s better, the fact is that any Dem besides Hillary could have beaten Trump. Too many people hate her. If only the we had a relatable , charismatic candidate we could have gone with... It’s a shame.

You’re falsely assuming that the tiny overall percentage of voters who went for Stein were protesting Clinton and not, you know, voting for their actual preferred presidential candidate. That’s not how democracy works.

“Tiresome” is a polite way of putting it.

Exactly. We can’t vote for our own ideal candidate in the system that we have. Not until we have ranked choiced voting.

This is so tiresome.

“Otherwise, plan on expanding your safe spaces.”

That’s rich, you call AirBnB and Uber exploitative yet completely ignore how hotels and taxis have been exploiting people for decades. A New York cab medallion cost $1 million a year ago, what the actual fuck!?

That is one of the things that irks me about this election. People are so completely caught up in how bad Trump is that they’re literally willing to overlook any other matters of importance. Clinton could go on TV tomorrow, say that she’ll slaughter the first born child of every household and I believe most people…

So you’d disqualify someone based on some crappy thing they said rather than disqualify a candidate based on their horrible decisions while in public office?

The anti-Hillary tweet indeed sounds very infantile, poorly-thought out and just generally dumb. BUT —- how exactly is making fun of someone’s laugh “sexist”? Particularly if that someone is a high-profile politician? I’m asking out of geniune curiousity, not a troll-quest.

It’s art try not to find logic.

Don Lemon may be a douche, but he’s a douche wearing a shirt.

Yeah. Compliments are the fucking worst!

> They all, as previously pointed out, all demand big, overpowering government to rule the little people’s lives for them...

If my message seemed condescending, it’s because I was replying in kind - your sweeping generalizations about topics like GMOs (again - many progressives are in FAVOR of GMO food, including me) are a form of condescension by the ignorant; and lets face it, you are (or appear from your comments) completely ignorant of…

You are simply incorrect - communism, in fact, is based on the idea of the state “withering away”, although of course it was never carried out that way. Trying to equate communism with socialism only shows that you don’t understand what either is. France, Sweden, and a number of other Euroepean countries are socialist…

In fact, communist != socialist != progressive.

The main thing that happened in the Gastaldo et al. paper is that they argue that the Karoo Basin rocks that have been interpreted as being the age of the Permian-Triassic boundary are actually a few (hundred thousands of) years older. They’re fully Permian, rather than being partially Permian and partially Triassic.…

Clearly, they’ve never found their own target.