*bzzt* Wrong. God isn't a scientific theory "just like" the Big Bang.

Reading Comp is challenging for many, apparently including yourself. "Most correct" implies that there is some amount of validity to the claim that God created the earth. From a scientific perspective, there isn't. Science and religion have different tests of validity; one is objective, the other subjective. Geography…

"God" isn't a "more correct" answer. On a geography test — not English or history or comparative religion — all of those answers are equally incorrect. The question is not "the Earth was *believed* to be created by..." it was "the earth *was* created by..."

Not in the slightest. I think it sounds moronic.

Does this mean Facebook has jumped the (^^^)?

Perfect Tommy?

Leeloo, aka BOZO.

Grandma!?

Why bother with plot when you have froth to keep you turning the pages?

You've clearly never attended art school. Art can certainly be discussed and experienced — even enjoyed — in a purely intellectual fashion. Sad, in a way, but true

That would be Kili. Fili is a bit more butch, but a similar idea.

Thank you!

So was I. Of course, given their appearance, I was disappointed they didn't grant an extra life or, at the very least, insane amounts of energy.

According the the New Scientist, they're dry and tasteless, anyway. Observing scientists have theorized they are so brightly colored so as to attract birds to eat them, thus spreading the seeds.

*wipes tear from eye*

That was what I thought, as well — except a potion is an item.

Right before the nine minute mark, I was expecting Freddie Mercury to come in asking, "Who wants to live forever?"

I reach, brother. We are one.

I didn't realize Triceratops was renamed that profoundly.

I use 3G on my iPad all the time, but I live in a small town and am often in rural areas where I'm happy even to have 3G work. In fact, since I got an Air last fall, I rarely use my iPad except when I'm out & about, which usually means 3G. If the mini has cellular, I might spring for it.