That would actually do the trick for me.

Yeah I believe it, and on the flip-side, they’ll also say anything to make tickets seem less bad than they are to get you to stop arguing with them at the scene.

yeah, it makes a whole lot of sense!

For a second I was all like “hmm, she could totally be a liar”, but you’re right, that doesn’t matter. These police officers should know better than to have sex with a suspect. And also, she shouldn’t have been so afraid over something as trivial as some pot. That’s another problem. It’s remarkably easy for police…

I think you’ve just described a subset of super fandom. If you apply this to everyone you are applying a stereotype that you have.

The article never brings up the fact that these statistics are very narrow and not everyone may interpret these statistics correctly. It’s easy to forget the other what? 95%+ of porn watchers, that likely have wildly different splits when it comes to this agree/disagree questions.

What you enjoy in the bedroom may very likely not have bearing on how you treat each other outside of the bedroom. If consenting adults enjoy cum on the face, let them cum on the face.

Jokes aside, I’d be curious to know if the researchers gathered any information about the types of porn these people generally watch and if they seek out ethically produced stuff or not.

What? You’re saying that unilaterally people that watch porn are jack-offs? Or is this just a dad joke because they do in fact jack off to the porn?

“the House-passed bill in its current form is filled with poison pills that threaten to undermine parental and conscience rights”

I’ll vote for a houseplant if that’s what it takes.

Yeah and the only people benefiting from its complexity are the ones employed by it and the ones taking advantage of the loopholes in it.

Yeah and it’s a way to get started in politics. And I don’t think working on a campaign needs to go away. But there’s probably a lot of waste there too. And it would be significantly less jobs if campaign funds are fixed for all candidates.

Yes, exactly. We get all these “heat warming” stories of the American spirit, “helping your neighbor”, or some such bullshit. While really it’s individuals making up for shortcomings of our government. And we’re not even talking about social programs either, we’re talking about body armor, school supplies and roads,…

I think for politicians to start getting things like the allotted air time I’m talking about, or access to a certain budget, that’s tricky, we wouldn’t want to just anyone being able to access those resources. They’d have to clear a certain bar, such as already having held office, or polling at a certain level, or a…

Yeah, it’s not like they become better presidents/senators, etc if they have larger campaign budgets, campaigns contribute almost ZERO to society.

I’d like to see reform to the point that politics are communism. Everyone has the same access, the same budget, the same airtime, the same rules.

I recently spoke with someone that blamed the recent heatwave in Europe on the windmills in the Netherlands. He said this with a straight face. So, all this to say that I know at least one supporter of such a platform.

Interesting, I see he has a similar book title to my phrase. Did he coin it, or is he just famous for it?

I’ve said it many times before, “don’t let great stand in the way of good” and Bernie is taking it to a whole new level here. His level is like “instead of getting 80%, let’s shoot for 800%. I think he’d make a whole lot more friends (voters) if there were some sort intermediate goal and plan. Something that doesn’t…