oh I don’t know, maybe going around and tearing down any kind of statue or memorial that we may find uncomfortable to look at?
Ihatewalking
yousonofabitch
how many have you actually attended?
why would that be disturbing?
they did disarm her. And yes, if you point a gun at an officer you will end up dead, those are the rules of society.
No, no they haven’t.
nah, nobody is outraged because he isn’t the right color
did you even read the article?
they did follow protocol, they carried spray and battons, but she threatened them with a knife and didn’t follow commands to back up. Nobody said she had a gun, learn to read bro
actually I do have an arguement to stand on. If you invite the police into your house and then threaten them, you may end up dead. Courts around the nation all agree, including the supreme court. You lose this one
never said she had a gun, a knife is a deadly weapon in anybodys hand, dumbass
no quarter moon vents, clearly not a fat chick
but are the police trigger happy or do we simply have more deranged assholes?
it very much “deescalated” the situation, as in she was no longer a threat to everyone in her proximity.
there is a difference between breaking up a fight and being confronted with a deadly weapon. The article clearly states that the swedes dealt with the incident in the same manner that American police would.
I have to work all weekend, close enough
try and stay on topic buddy, this woman was a known criminal, she threatened officers and didn’t comply with commands, this was the result, and it will probably be justified in the eyes of the law.
has nothing to do with being black, more white people are shot by police than black people. Criminals bring it on themselves.
blm exists because people don’t want to be held accountable for their actions. The supreme court states “The ‘reasonableness’ of a particular force must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight,”. If people don’t want deadly confrontations…