Yes... bad things can still be bad at slow speeds. (slow clap)
THE POINT IS: bad things can be so much worse at higher speeds.

If you hit a speed bump at 40 miles/hour more bad will happen than if you had hit it at 25. NOW IMAGINE AT 170, cause all it would have taken was 1 pothole and he would have been airborne.

Love the thought and detail and it make sense.
BUT is it practical?
Would law enforcement be able to use this as the standard procedure? Because you cant cater to each case individually.
Does everyone who speed excessively have a nice car that the gov.t will spend time trying to sell so that they can buy you another car…

There’s usually a DUI checkpoint every other weekend leaving York County PA... So by your logic York women and children cannot leave on the weekend nights?
You’re making it seem like women and children shouldn’t be on the road at night...
Ppssstt your ignorance is showing

You might not want to pay for his incarceration but that doesn’t change the fact that we incarcerate those who brake laws that put other's safety at risk.

Jail time is a stretch... Time to bust out the research, cause I’m calling you out.
Look at all the stupid reasons you can get jail time. Now look at what he did. You are correct in assuming it wasn’t voluntary manslaughter. But he put a lot of lives at risk which is still called reckless endangerment. And that’s just…

Right... its stupid logic because...?
Are you one of those ppl that don’t consider children people?
Do crimes against children not matter to you?
Or are you not aware that children are more likely to die in a car crash than adults?

Yes. Yes it does. And has done so for hundreds of years.
Tell me, can this guy willingly repeat his crime today? No.. cause he's in jail. Sounds like the system works to me...

YEAH!(sarcasm) Don’t make the world safer, make people who want to be safe, wear helmets! You clearly missed the point. You say ppl do bad thing and the solution is other ppl should protect themselves better... OR REMOVE THE BAD THING
“If safety matter so much to you that you would happily ruin lives-” I cant believe…

Your argument is "hitting ppl at 55 will also be fatal." Which is beyond absurd. Glad you added "probably" cause it shows what we are all thinking... You are talking out of your ass. Ive been in a van hit at 70 and no one died. Your saying let him do 170 cause ppl will die at 55... "he is most likely to pass me and…