Sam, it’s been 15 hours since you posted this, & the massive glaring error that you opened your criticism with has been pointed out several times. Either acknowledge or correct the mistake already.
Sam, it’s been 15 hours since you posted this, & the massive glaring error that you opened your criticism with has been pointed out several times. Either acknowledge or correct the mistake already.
I didn’t catch that either, & I had subtitles on. I thought he just killed Thor because he knew Fury would recruit him.
Haven’t seen this one yet, but I think the fact that everyone is fixated on the voice cast and who is and isn’t from the Marvel movies is hurting this thing. Get a good no name cast and let the cartoons be their own thing is my admonition. This is not to say it isn't fun to play "Guess the Actor", but that isn't the…
A whole lot of plot complaints for a show about alternate realities.
“I like that as a plot point, because Hank Pym was a real bastard for an extended period of time in the comics”
My 16-yr-old daughter and I thought the exploding Hulk bit was cool. Definitely pushed the envelope without getting too disgusting, like having them all covered in green guts.
Lake Bell actually has played Black Widow before, in Robot Chicken. Nice to see she can do a serious version too, and I wouldn’t be too opposed to seeing her do it in live action now that Scarlett’s definitely never coming back.
It has long been established that Iron Man 2, Thor and Incredible Hulk take place within the same week. It was even a short, “Fury’s Wild Week.”
It all happens in the same week?
Isn’t it canonically all one week? Anyway, I liked this one a lot. It felt to me, MCU fan and sometimes comics reader, like the best hybrid of both so far. Especially Loki, who had a great streak of chaotic opportunism that’s often missing from the MCU. To each their own, of course, but if entertainment was the goal,…
That “weak” franchise paid Depp $16 million for the third film even after he was asked to leave it. Excuse me while I shed my tears for the poor, poor man. And who cares if he was playing the villain? Michael B. Jordan’s career got a huge boost by playing a villain. Finally, and I don’t know how many times I’m going…
Mel Gibson was a major star in movies like The Patriot, What Women Want, We Were Soldiers, and Signs at the start of the 2000s, took a brief break to direct a pair of high profile movies in 2004 and 2006, the incident with the drunken slurs happened right before the release of Apocalypto in 2006. Since then he’s…
Take another look at your post I was responding to. You are the one who dismissed the situation involving these people to just being just (and I quote) “disliked by many on social media.” If you think these people deserved to be cancelled, I think there’s a reasonable argument for that, but to act like the various…
Very different. In a criminal case the burden of proof is “beyond a reasonable doubt”. In a civil case it is “the preponderance of evidence,” which means more than a 50% chance that a claim is true. That’s why there are occasions where someone can be found not guilty in criminal proceedings but found liable in a civil…
This is a civil suit, so it's liability, not guilt.
Mel Gibson and Johnny Depp’s might technically “continue to have careers” in the sense that they’re not homeless but both of them have taken major career hits because of their actions. They used to be huge movie stars, now the former is mostly working in odd low budget stuff and the later is being removed from…
So some random people he’s never heard of and will never meet think badly of him. If he’s found not guilty in court, and continues to have a career - as Mel Gibson, Johnny Depp, Jared Leto and others accused of impropriety have before him - then what is anyone worried about? Being disliked by “many on social media”…
“Why should we be worried for Dylan - he’s innocent until proven guilty in a court of law”
Why should we be worried for Dylan - he’s innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. It’s the accuser who’ll have the harder job of finding evidence that stands up after 56 years, and hopefully they have a good lawyer who won’t go ahead with this case without such evidence. If the accuser can provide evidence…
... and this is why you have statute of limitations on these things. I’m not super sure how someone would go about defending their name in situations like this if they happened fifteen years ago, much less 56. Dylan even has the benefit of being a celebrity surrounded by people and journalists establishing some of…