yourlocalitguy
Your Local IT Guy
yourlocalitguy

You are so right.

Ignoring cancer makes it go away.

True. But the policy of engaging an active shooter as quickly as possible is the new standard. The theory is that it breaks the shooters rhythm and forces him to pull focus from the people he is targeting. They have training for how to engage an active shooter without putting yourself in harms way. From what the

Definitely see your point, but firemen can and do refuse to enter structure fires. It happens all the time, at least according to my uncles, who are firemen. There’s usually a safety officer on the scene or in the department that determines when the situation is too dangerous. Then it’s just “surround and drown” time,

That is false. Ever since Columbine, when there is an active shooter situation they go in immediately. They learned the hard way that quick action is the only to stop these things.

If people aren’t doing their jobs, shitcan them. Unceremoniously. It’s homicidal negligence at this point.

I think it needs to be stated, definitively and for all time, that the 2nd Amendment isn’t going away. Ever. And there won’t ever be a government-led “gun grab.” And that’s fine. Both are logistically improbable, pie-in-the-sky dreams.

Was she planning on committing a mass shooting? If I scrap my car, will you share a video saying that I’m preventing more car crash deaths?

Yeah....in a shitty punk band. On the other hand your opinion means very.....very little.

You’re just as much part of the problem. Denouncing the person who won’t denounce. You terrorize anyone who seeks to have a nuanced response to a situation. You’re a special kind of awful.

I definitely have the capacity to notice pretension, which is why I could give two shits about being construed as some made-up term (ally) and not being privvy to what ModernFeminist magazine defines as the end-all-be-all definition of what a good man is.

That’s great. Statistics exist for a reason. If you’re being truthful, it’s a fact that your situation is nowhere near the norm. That’s great for you, but it’s not reality for most. There are people who can run 4-minute miles. None of them believe that because they did something it’s the norm. In fact, statistics

That’s a great suggestion, but as people generally need to work to afford said education, we might be in a bit of a pickle.

The automation elephant in the room has been around since society started. The solution is to raise/educate people for other jobs, not to hang on to old and inefficient methods.

Women aren’t weak, but this modern strain of paternalistic feminism is trying its hardest to make them weak. “I was giving nonverbal cues that I wasn’t interested.” Weird, because two consensual blowjobs later seem like a pretty conclusive non-verbal cue. The premise that he is was anything other than rude is

From what I read on this site, particularly the Ham No articles, the correct answer is “all of it.”

Not really. I work at a state university and have coworkers who save up vacation to do 3-day weekends all summer. Some normal jobs for not-rich people have great vacation benefits. Some don’t. It’s that same old icky privilege again, but someday we will cleanse society and be free from the existence of people who have

This whole post is bait.

You missed the point of that, which I gather was the “rising tide” philosophy. The rich get richer, but the poor are not getting poorer - just not getting as rich. At least, that is what I think they are arguing. Given any fix is a world war or plague, not sure how those folks are “morally bankrupt” for being wise

Psh. Family business? That’s definitely cheating. Cleaning dynasties are bad for democracy. 

It’s fucking bananas with that morality bullshit.