yourlocalitguy
Your Local IT Guy
yourlocalitguy

Reprogramming their populace is next to impossible. Every doc I have seen on the country inevitably shines a light on just how deeply ingrained their love of the Great Leader is. Their propaganda machine has been working 24/7 for decades, convincing generations that their leadership is infallible. Asking them to

Or sixty years of administration from both parties kicking this particular can down the road.

Could it be the fact that people are dying to live in NYC and the reality is that Harlem, Brooklyn, North Jersey etc. is where it’s affordable? Does every geographical shift have to be considered a nefarious one? BIG BUSINESS may have their own agenda, but what about a typical young family moving to a big city trying

I think that’s a much better way to frame the argument. But, there’s a thing in Hollywood with British actors as a whole—despite their skin color, and part of it is that acting is often approached much differently here than there...many British actors are truly trained, in a way that many American actors, black and

Who rang you and asked for your cents girl?

My “favorite” is how working-class people are somehow only white. Who’d a thunk it?!

Well all due respect how are we ever going to be “equal” if people like you keep insisting we treat people differently? I’ve had injuries before and NO one offered me their seats. Men work harder than women and “children” we deserve to take a load of our feet after a hard days work. Besides, all we get for trying to

You do nothing. Innocent until proven guilty is the rule of law in the United States. You should not be able to punish someone who has not been convicted in any way, shape, or form.

So what would you do with regard to people who are charged but those charges end up being dismissed? People are charged all the time for a wide assortment of crimes, not just domestic violence, and then later evidence comes to light that those charges were not appropriate.

Do you acknowledge that bad people will be able to get their hands on weapons? If so, then why do you want everyone else to be a potential victim? If someone is armed and wants to do harm to me, I want to be able to have any chance to protect myself. I don’t want to say “Whelp, I guess I have to wait for a trained

Right - you can’t ban physics and chemistry or objects that can be affected by physics and chemistry. So even if *poof* magically all guns were removed from the world tomorrow, we would still have evil, we would still have violence, and we would still have ways for evil people to inflict mass casualties should they

You do realize that ITguys comment was about how people have been killed by cars and pressure cooker bombs and not just shootings like this and how banning guns will not stop random violence? But everyone should keep preaching the anti gun agenda because once all the guns are gone there will be no more violence and

Jesus Christ, just outlaw baseball already.

This comment section is going to be a dumspter fire, isn’t it.

The thought stemmed from a little mental exercise... wore some shoes.

If you’re a federal, state, or local employee, you probably enjoy greater protections for political speech than you would if you’re a private employee.

“I was angry that a slap angers people more than a young man being stabbed to death. Sue me for being angry.”

Ok then. Let’s get rid of the nukes. But only if Russia does obviously. We should form a treaty with Russia to get rid of our nukes. Perhaps we could call it...un-armament..........nah disarmament sounds better. We could have nuclear disarmament treaties. And they could require both countries to overtime destroy their

If Japan had the ability to Nuke the US, they would have during Pearl Harbor. Negotiated surrender often just leads to kicking the problem down the line for the next generation.

Surely just use an orbital sun focusing satellite to cut a swathe through the DMZ.