In four years, they can wonder how Trump got reelected!

Steve Bannon cannot legally serve on the NSC. He’s not a secretary or undersecretary and he has not been confirmed by the Senate.

No need for this. He can’t legally be on the NSC if someone would simply point it out.

There shouldn’t be a need for such a bill. Bannon is not a secretary or under-secretary of any department and he has not been confirmed by the Senate. Therefore he is not allowed, by law, to serve on the NSC.

More notably, he made it clear he still wants to abolish the Johnson Amendment. Make no mistake. If you’re LGBTQ or want autonomy over your own body, your rights are in the crosshairs. Nothing good can come over allowing religious groups a greater voice in government.

When Trump gets reelected in four years, it’ll save time to just post clips from this riot when snowflakes ask, “But why!?”

An issue or a violent riot? People should expect it to be an issue, but I guess we need to adjust to a world where sheltered brats at university will throw a temper tantrum whenever someone shakes up their comfy little nest.

Blaming the students who invited him? Grow up. They have a right to hear Milo speak.

Well they’re pretty clearly anti-free speech. Except for speech they agree with, of course.

When Trump gets re-elected, it’s going to be because of shit like this. You stupid fucking morons. Fuck all these people rioting over some fucking troll like Milo. Grow the hell up.

lol It’s a photo of her looking at him. Relax.

This isn’t Trump. This is Bannon and he’s taking a page straight from Hitler’s playbook. Seriously. The Trump administration is creating so much chaos and confusion, instituting so many insane policies, that the opposition is too divided to cover everything. He might not get everything he wants, but he’ll get a lot of…

I work for a major animal welfare nonprofit and went to a screening of the film a month or so ago. Really glad we didn’t get involved. The movie was plain terrible.

My republican friends are telling me these questions are “an ambush.”

The same people saying “I don’t need to understand Trump voters” are the same ones who were saying, “I don’t understand how this happened” on election night. Maybe an effort to understand each other would be good.

Refusing to connect with people because you don’t like their opinions (newsflash: they don’t all consider themselves racist, nor are they by default) is an awesome way to get Trump re-elected.

Come on. I hate Trump and everything happening, but saying “Russia has taken over” is extremely hyperbolic. Trump might be a delusional, orange faced garbage fire, but there are a ton of people standing between him and some sort of world where we’re all speaking Russian.

lol “Updated” because you actually attempted to find out “reasons.”

You could have done a cursory amount of research to find out possible reasons why they voted against the bill. It’s not hard.

Does anyone really believe he can realistically promise such a thing? You’re talking about policies that impact millions of people and she’s asking him whether he can prevent these policies from not impacting a specific handful of people. That doesn’t seem remotely realistic.