Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    you-old
    You
    you-old

    I doubt this will get anywhere near a court. Now that the police are saying they were indeed there, you can all but guarantee they are also going to say Apple didn't pretend to be cops. Can you imagine a cop in court saying he/she was there and allowed Apple to violate the law directly in front of him/her? Not

    It has nothing to do with it being Apple or Oracle or Google or whoever else. The point is, if the "Apple Police" didnt' flash badges or say they were cops, they didn't do anything wrong. This seems more to me like it was the actual cops who didn't do things correctly. It seems they used their badges to get the

    If the Apple employees didn't flash badges they (Apple's employees) didn't get permission fraudulently. Assuming they were all cops the way the guy did was an error on his part. One thing that the guy should have done is questioned why the people who did flash badges didn't enter... Another thing he should have done

    How? Apple isn't the one who said they weren't there, then changed and said they were. If this is a big pile of shit it is for the SFPD more than Apple...

    How is asking for permission to search the guy's house and not entering until he gave permission considered thugging their way in?

    Another smart move would be to get their names and badge numbers.

    Looks like there cops there, so guess he has nothing now...

    Even if they did impersonate police, it has to be proven... This guy's word will not be enough...

    Now the page doesn't exist on CNET?

    Potential money maker if there isn't one... Better patent that idea!!!

    Did Xzibit tell you that?

    And soon after they get the iPhone they will announce they are eliminating unlimited and switching to tiered pricing...

    Yes, and lower costs of calls to their (AT&T) network, I believe...

    About anything they say...

    Are we sure we want to believe the government?

    MacRumors has some information claiming otherwise...

    "The touchscreen is patent-able. The method for using it is not."

    +1

    Perhaps the reason they make fake videos is because of sites like this one that are giving them recognition for it?

    Why is there an iPad in the main picture?