You spelled "awesome" wrong.

Just in regards to the "who created the creator" question, it's a good question but kind of silly; if you believe that God/the gods/nirvana/whatever exists outside of time itself, the idea of "creation" doesn't make since because it implies a beginning.

He's saying that God's existence is not dependent upon religion's existence. If God exists, he does so regardless of whether or not religion does. Likewise, if he doesn't exist, religion doesn't make him real. Speaking as a fellow Christian as of a few years ago, I don't see what OP said that is wrong.

About Mario and Donkey Kong, they're considering a Zelda series which we'll hopefully hear about soon, so if that goes through, who knows...

Great, now I can't unsee that. Thanks.

So he's a politician who flip-flops... kind of like Obama on marijuana legalization, foreign war, and the NDAA.

Why would they want less mullet?

1000 internet points to you.

I wonder where he got that Connor figurine. It's cool.

How about a game where you force PETA members to fight each other?

Connor is about freedom. In one of the developer's diaries, they emphasize that one of the differences between Connor and Ezio/Altair is that he's motivated by a sense of nobility and justice, not duty or revenge. So, even if the assassins represent chaos (I don't agree with you here), it would make more sense to have…

At first I thought it was more of an existential statement on the dichotomy of both good and evil in human nature, but now that you point it out, it's definitely economics.

Pretty sure that putting it in the trailer implicitly means they want us to see it.

If only

Agreed. It's sensationalism and it's shameful that Kotaku is using it.

No, but they have an allegiance to ideology, such as opposition to tyranny, just like... you know what, nevermind. The whole "controversy" over this game is stupid, everyone is looking for witches to burn, and I'm just sick of discussing it.

woah...

What is there to explain? I'm not really interested in someone simply berating me for aligning a tyrannic regime with the Templars, so I'll explain only if you're genuinely curious.

True, but it makes more sense that an assassin would wide with the colonists.

*sigh*.