It's not something to be worried about now, but look at what humans in power use these systems for in other countries. Dare to change religion in Tehran? The government will literally cut your head off. Speak out against Our Wonderful Leader in North Korea? You may just never be seen again. Oh, you don't deeply love…

And then have his camera "confiscated" (aka probably smashed).

Wow, I'm surprised by all the hate in the comments. I think the reason he's vague is because Aliens/demons/evil spirits or whatever aren't the point, so why bother focusing on them?

Am I the only one who doesn't find these things "cute"? They just seem weird to me.

Good point - "pro-abortion" is also a terrible phrase to use. As to why I think "pro-life" and "anti-choice" are bad, think of it this way: someone whom is called "anti-choice" will probably support "choice" in general: career, housing, hobbies, eating habits, driving, etc.; therefore they aren't "against choice," or…

Right but "choice" itself extends far beyond abortion, just like "life" does, so they seem like inappropriate terms to use in my opinion.

I don't mean it that way - obviously no one "loves" abortions - but imagine for a second that you're an outside observer trying to figure out human society. If you heard that someone was "anti-choice", you would assume that they were against giving people choices; what cereal to eat in the morning, what career you'll…

GMOs are banned from the cafeteria of the biggest GMO company, Monsanto. They pour MILLIONs of dollars into lobbying efforts against things such as forced GMO labeling in grocery stores.

Being anti-abortion does not mean "anti-choice". That's about as fair as saying a pro-abortion person is "anti-life". Seriously, people? Geez. This isn't rocket science, it's BASIC LOGIC.

Can you say "propaganda"?

I think I'm going to find a way to cryogenically freeze myself until Fringe starts up again.

Yeah, I'd definitely tear up your VIP card.

Good point. I'm rethinking.

This video doesn't show Connor killing women or children! This is so offensive! Obviously the creators are sexist and ageist! Since there could be female Templars, it's only fair that Connor should be shown scalping ladies, too. Also, Templars obviously have kids, so it's only right that Ubisoft also shows Connor…

If he was "neutral" during that time, I'd respect Connor a lot less. I get that Templars are on both sides, but doesn't it make more sense that a secret society about controlling the world would have more agents on the side that's a tyrannical, oppressive government? Doesn't it make more sense that it make more sense…

THANK YOU.

I, for one, wouldn't complain too much if that was the case.

Swish!

Yes but the nervous system and the immune system are two different stories. Biological viruses may have varying effects on people, but if the chips are planted in a person's gray matter, severing a few nerves or sending the wrong signals will f*** people up with a near 100% rate.

Yes... a horrific surveillance state is perfectly analogous to sirens... sure...