Why not?
Why not?
Here I thought "unalienable rights" were, um, unalienable or something like that. But you're right, we only have a right to voice our opinions because it's in the Constitution.
Scientists send out signal that triggers a vanguard platoon of aliens to investigate earth.
Yay for freedom of speech and unalienable rights, amirite?
Someone should make a movie where ManBearPig kills everyone.
What? You didn't find Avatar's plot intriguing and unpredictable??? What about the depth and convincingness of the characters?
I didn't see it in 3D. I STILL want those two hours back.
Except the name... it sounds like it should be a b-grade comedy.
I'm not sure we have the same definition of "libertarianism"...
I was trying to compare Obama to Paul; this might be a better way. I guess I'm assuming you're an Obama supporter so I apologize if I'm assuming incorrectly.
A law saying that anyone (even US citizens) can be locked up for the rest of their lives without ever being told why or having a trial is FAR worse than personally opposing abortion.
Speaking as a pro-Paul college students, many (MANY) of my friends here are Paul supporters and are NOT stoners. I myself have absolutely no interest in any of the stuff.
Re-posting from the guy above, if only to re-iterate that people seriously need to cut it with the anti-Paul "racism" comments. They're not based on fact:
I think you mean "cymbal"... either that or I'm completely missing the point.
I see what you did there.
The kid from Harry Potter? What does he have to do with this?
True. (about him not being right on all things).
I clicked it, but it's not worth logging back into facebook after being clean for 2+ months. Sorry Mike.
And now I'm realizing that I really did make myself look like a sarcastic a**hole, but dang it I can't delete my original comment.
First, I do apologize for my sarcastic tone. I admit to getting a little riled up.