yetanotherburner1
YetAnotherBurner1
yetanotherburner1

It isn’t Southern. It hails from Harlem originally, but has become a common pairing on any menu that serves one item or the other. It isn’t even just chicken and waffles, it has a spin on it that pushes it further away from the stereotype, so it seems more like reaching for a grievance than really having one.

“I can do what I want and you can’t even have an objection or opinion.”

...what? Pretty sure I am just making basic points and it is you acting like a know-it-all asshole.

Dude, I am winding down my workday and just not looking to do anything else but skim these blogs until I clock out. Cute though, asserting I am a troll because... why again? Seems like I make pretty simple arguments and don’t shy from discussion. Oh well, it probably is easier to just call someone a troll than to

I can see why they get upset over white people coming in, taking what they like about it, and using it to make money.

....wait what? If I was dealing with internalized hatred, wouldn’t I be tearing into the white people for this. Nice try though.

As often as I can. :D

How dare you assume I have a wooden cross! :D

Honestly, it doesn’t really matter where it is. If they want to celebrate hip hop in a kitschy way, why be outraged? It definitely isn’t racist. I just don’t see the issue at all. And their menu looks fucking good - so I hope they make it. Not a lot of people get to live their dream and I guess maybe I am mostly

How is the view up there from your high horse?

whitewashing hip-hop culture.

I have a clue. I know where Hip Hop is from and rather love it myself. That being said, they are a restaurant. BREAKFAST restaurant. So if they want traffic, they can’t blast hardcore gangster rap, now can they? Again, get some scope. And no, I don’t know you - but judging by your lack of commenting “Hey, I know these

Probably. I am relocating to a city soon and out of this rural hellscape, so that will probably lend itself to interacting with them more.

They do. Just look around this blog.

1-in-300 people

They have zero libertarian agenda - they do not support any level of civil rights, thus instantly precluding them from libertarianism which values individual liberty.

Right? It is such an unevenly and ridiculously applied concept.

No, it is what Gawker does to get clicks. And we seemingly keep falling for it.

It was a failure to the writer because of perceived racial slights and nothing more. I wish them luck.