Not so good at reading are you? I said Pacific Northwest... not Southwest. And holy shit, your weirdly racist tone is just unpleasant. For one, I am a guy. Second, I am from Vermont - where my father’s family settled and are all full-blooded Algonquins (tracing back up further north). You are so desperate to be right…

Wait, what? My beliefs do not mirror religions. I am not saying my god is better. I am saying their god can be used dangerously. And how are you even attempting to compare my position against religion to mass murder? Not demonizing the people - I am casting a needed light on their mythology and how it has historically…

No, but he chose to be good. And you don’t need religion to do so. Humanism shows that to be true. And what you don’t wind up with if you opt for humanism is jihads and crusades and genocides.

Oh my god that is hilarious. You find me five strong examples of Atheists who have crusaded against religious folks and I will concede. Of the countless millions dead due to religious oppression/persecution, you think that there is any level of equivalency? Don’t be absurd.

So what god did he use to justify the killing of said people? Or was he just a piece of shit tyrant? Hint: the latter.

Nice attempt though.

They’d just find another justification.

full-blown jihads, inquisitions or crusades nowadays,

Only if it is an ‘88 Ford F-150 XLT Lariant. Now that is Heaven.

Whoaaa there. I don’t think Catholics would appreciate that scathing critique.

Yea, but nothing helps further that evil than saying some invisible being in the sky said to do it and if you don’t believe him, you are a heretic of the highest order. That sort of shit is terrifying. That is how you get Crusades, Inquisitions, Jihadists, and all that shit. Hard pass. Religion needs to go. It has no…

Using their religion to justify violent behavior that wouldn’t have said justification (or motive in many cases) without the religion. Seriously, you can be a good, moral person without religion, but it sure is hard to declare a Jihad or religious crusade without a religion to justify it. The divisiveness alone is not…

+1 Witcher reference

No, those are people of peace. Religion is poison, no matter the flavor.

Hint: The GOP doesn’t actually want small gov’t. They want a gov’t that is big and does what they want. The party of limited gov’t died a long time ago.

Oh don’t be fucking stupid. Homage to their culture/art. Jesus, if you got to get hung up on semantics, you must be the one desperate for a position to defend. And I am not misusing it. Homage my art is, even if you disagree as I have stated already.

Oh no, I get it. My art is an homage, even if you don’t think so. Just like I can pay homage to Egyptian art without calling any agencies or people in Egypt to ask if it is all good to do so. Or Sumerian art. Or European art. ETC ETC. Culture is there to inspire. Just because this recent push against “appropriation”…

Hysterical? Really? Because it isn’t on my position to justify additional gun laws. That is on you if you are going to take the position that to curb these sorts of shootings we need more. Not me. And I don’t answer strawman bullshit, because it derails the argument and attempts to thrust the onus on me - but I don’t…

Cartoon ironically divisive when concerning divisiveness.

Oh what the fuck! This seemed pretty straight-forward... how the fuck did this wind up as a Not Guilty verdict?!

Dammit. I am not exactly an Obama fan policy-wise... but this I was a huge fan of. And now the living disaster that is Trump has undermined one of those few good things I felt Obama did... I really can’t wait for the impeachment proceedings to start and end this madness.