Supercars don't have V6s. There, I said it. 

And yet you didn’t use that picture

I’m glad the sites you visit have better ads. The sites I like to visit just got them today...

I think it’s acute design.

Staff - Those are collectively the worst suggestions ever. Please fire yourselves.

Well isn’t the Audi R8 V10 just dandy then...

Do base models generally exist in large numbers for anything other than econoboxes?

Hey Bradley, help me out with this: “The new Elantra is 2.2 inches overall longer than the outgoing model.” then, in the same paragraph “The big surprise is that this new car is actually 0.8 inches shorter than the outgoing model.”

Do you mean the car’s height / roof is 0.8 inches shorter? That distracted me way too…

I get that the styling isn't exactly "beautiful" but as someone directly in the target market for a vehicle like this I actually find it pretty cool and distinctive. Hyundai/Kia are really going for it and are at the top of my list when I'm ready for my next car.

“This measure best reflects our comprehensive efforts to expand into new product segments and foster a customer-creation culture - one that is laser-focused on our riders and fans who are passionate about being overweight and dressing like they didn’t get the callback from the Village People after their audition.”

Time to add an 8 inch lift, smoke stacks, and do a Cummins swap with egr delete

I think I’ve got it figured out...

Should have been the lead photo.

I've expected for a while to see Mitsubishi and Toast in the same headline.

A manual seems very fitting in an interior that looks like it’s from 2008.

Neutral: I browse Jalopnik. Which probably isn’t great advice for a Jalopnik writer trying to get away.

About the same as a healthy adult dying from corona virus

So a Land Rover Discovery??? I thought Ford and Land Rover parted ways?

I don’t get why logos are “due for updates” anyway. Unless there’s a fundamental shift in the business that muddles the logo’s message or they used some very period-specific styling in the first place, there’s no need to change something that currently works. It only makes sense when there’s a functional issue to be…

I think you’re framing this irresponsibly. It’s more like he got the job, was like hey something’s up, talked to the correct authorities and got the company to fix it, and now that it’s obviously awkward he’s going to go get a new job.