The use of the nested verb clauses here is super trippy because c) is both related to the original subject and a dependent clause of b).

That’s 9 inches. Trust me, 9 inches makes a big difference.

I read it twice, said “what?” out loud to myself, and then scrolled down.

Way too easy. Still good

Well, you see, I think it's oh god I'm so distracted

As a Seahawks fan, the mixture of blind optimism and bleak disillusionment from my friends quite jarring

Firefly wore it better. Sorry not sorry

Wonder what Lauda would have to pay today for a seat, considering he actually did have to pay for a seat

Considering the crew is Pac 12, the officiating has been surprisingly good.

Judging from mechanism seen in the replay and the fact that he was moving all extremities in the first live shot, I think it is more likely that his injury involved twisting or bending of the neck muscles than anything related to the spinal cord.

+1 Husky

Holy shit this game

Exactly the opposite. It has to stay behind the line of scrimmage for this to be legal.

I’m not sure it’s as simple as you make it out. For one thing, it would make the cars dramatically slower, which as I pointed out elsewhere, is inconceivable for F1 as a commercial product. More generally, the problem in F1 is not that positions can’t be contested in braking zones, but rather that cars can’t follow…

A strong case can be made in favor of relaxing rules prohibiting ground effects, which are much less vulnerable to the “dirty air” phenomenon. I think the main objection to ground effects is that disruption of the low pressure pocket under the car can result in rather abrupt and potentially very dangerous loss of…

Part of the appeal of F1 (and in particular, the only reason for its attractiveness as a commercial entity) has been the glamour and cachet of being the fastest motorsport in the world. Disregarding for the moment whether it is literally the very pinnacle (MotoGP and WEC making strong cases in different ways), F1 cars…

I think what SubieNate and token_liberal are saying is that a larger rear diffuser will further disrupt the air behind it, making it harder to follow.

By rule, F1 brakes are currently limited to 278mm diameter, which is comparable in size to those on a Mazda Miata, but must dissipate a tremendous amount of energy for their size (recall that kinetic energy squares with velocity, but is linearly related to mass). I’m sure it is possible to reduce their size, but it…

Refueling is dangerous in unnecessary ways (not race-related, but still life-threatening). It also does not increase on-track competition except by packing cars together through forced pit stops, which the unpopular and shitty tires already accomplish to some degree.

To be fair, she is fully clothed