split it! got a lot of sensitive little stomachs around here.
xvcx
xvcx
like what? please, share.
it really isn’t.
oh, wow, that’s kind of bullshit.
wow, irish lady, what an asshole.
it only reads that way if you’re coming into this either defensively or disdainfully, and you’ve admitted you’re the former. it’s congratulatory.
we must run in different circles, then, because I’ve always heard the distinction made between national and local elections.
well, christ, obviously if this were a conversation I gave a shit about, I’d take care to phrase my words more carefully. and sorry if they don’t like the reality. but a third party candidate truly is impossible right away at the national level. I don’t like it, but I accept that change needs to start at the lower…
change starts from the bottom/local level.
you telling me to ‘grow up’ is hilarious considering public PDA is usually the domain of hormone-addled middle schoolers. maybe it’s the people who think it’s acceptable to tongue each other in public should give a thought to expressing a little maturity.
That’s a good way to end up dead from dehydration. Those things get CRAZY hot.
So don’t do it in public where we’re forced to watch.
I do, though. Because it is.
yes, because the republican party is known for their peaceful solutions!
yeah, and I disagree. this is why we don’t let emotion dictate laws.
it absolutely is throwing your vote away on the national level, though. vote third party/ies in local elections: that’s how you give legitimacy to third parties and work toward having more options. voting third party in national elections is akin to whispering into a void. sorry.
so ... where are you drawing the line, then? at what point is it okay for us to murder a human being for their crimes? gonna need specifics, here.
until the time the federal government exacts its revenge.
yeah, the bloodthirstiness in these comments is really disturbing.
What if the jury could give the victims’ families a permit to kill him? Would that be okay, or at least closer to okay?