sure, but one usually tries to keep their audience in mind!

... right, but talking to the commentariat as if you're addressing the majority of us is a little silly, not to mention arrogant.

okay, bro, have a good dayyyyyyy

lol at a jez comment as your 'evidence''!

that is exactly what it means.

the joke wasn't 'potentially harmful' if you read it correctly ...

thanks for the aggressive talking-to, but many of us don't.

that's not how I read the quote, and no, she did not give consent in any way, and the fact that you think she did is very disturbing.

... actually, that proves my point, not yours.

ahaha, this comment was brilliant. good job!

yes, yes, you're a genius. sshh.

i address coherent points, not babbling.

okay, gaga, that's enough. you can go home now.

that's a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. care to try again?

high-five to you for fighting the good fight. this asshole's been trolling around all day.

'Because I understand burden of proof.'

eh, okay, I don't think you're getting my point.

still using that word 'baseless,' I see, even though you have nothing to support that.

you don't get to tell people which threats are credible and which aren't unless you're personally investigating each and every one of them yourself, which I know you aren't. when women are constantly barraged with increasingly…

Yes, I get it — as in, I certainly understand that sexist, unbidden questions about children are directed at women a hundred percent more than men. My point, though, is that it's not as if she simply said 'oh, I work out really hard for this body' and that's all, and was barraged with 'who watches your kids'…

the fact that you have no idea if it's baseless is my point. you can't make that assumption.