But those people didn't choose to be ill. And you don't have to be bankrupt to be extremely poor.
But those people didn't choose to be ill. And you don't have to be bankrupt to be extremely poor.
Which is why I am a little skeptical of claims based on emotion that people tend to want to hold on to something nice in their life when things go sour. How did they get those things? Did they pay with credit?
The child didn't make the choice, so the answer is no, the child didn't deserve that.
"We didn't deserve to be poor, any more than we deserved to be rich. Poverty is a circumstance, not a value judgment."
Yeah, I mistook an animal for something else...
The tie was a (barely) tie. Why didn't you include that truth with your snark?
No, he is literally unmatched, as in, he ran 20-some-odd miles during the group stage, literally more than any other player in the tournament. Literally. If you want to say that this is not relevant to what constitutes a work ethic, fine, but that's a dubious claim.
No, Beasley is also quite bald. They are equivalent in their level of baldity.
The Clam was wrong, the German octopus that predicted a tie was wrong, and still all teams have lost after playing in Manaus.
His score was hilarious. I watched that game too and when he scored I wasn't even sure. He just turned around and walked away like nothing had happened, and it was only when I saw the score go up I knew. it was hilarious.
But they have good beer.
That's not true at all; we had two shots on goal within the last few minutes of the game alone. You didn't watch the whole game.
I agree. great idea.
Yes...he's pretty clearly bi-molar.
I think the guy has some mental issues. Maybe he's bi-molar.
That is true, but because Italy was down a man already, it made it easier for Uruguay to score. If Suarez is sent off with a red card, Uruguay is statistically much much less likely to score.
I agree. Which is why FIFA should look at how Americans handle our sporting events. We have tons of things we do to deal with this, such as adding additional refs to having challenges by coaches. If you are going to add 6 minutes of stoppage time, there's no legitimate reason why you can't take 15 seconds to look…
Why are they more easily fooled? This happens all the time, and it's not like nothing can be done about it; it's because FIFA doesn't want to do anything about it because it is considered part of the game. The idea is to force the ref to make a decision. This is gamesmanship. Drawing fouls is one thing; acting is…
He did. I heard this, and I laughed and laughed and was surprised no one actually commented on this on air. "Pun intended" should have been said by someone.
Then why not have another ref? You know, occasionally the rest of the world might want to learn from a country that has figured out how to handle stuff like this.