woodensword
WoodSword
woodensword

They cover the swastika nicely?

I bet if you lowered a piece of paper between them it would ignite

ominous

Rabin says it looks terrible but I think it suits her

Bangs, y/n?

Would you watch a staring contest between Rami and Michael Shannon?

fairy nuff

If they're at the top of every comment thread and make only tenuous references to the article via japanese video games, you best believe that's a mohd

Again, we are responding to Mohd, so the chances of this discussion being related to the article are very slim

A game's genre doesn't denote its quality, and the games in the article are pointedly not the ones being talked about in the comment I am responding to…referring to the games in the article at all is missing the point in a large way: mohd is talking about games that should exist, and those ones up there do already.

No, I'm saying there's contemporary fantasy everywhere right now, so the fact that there isn't as much contemporary fantasy as there is other genres in gaming is no great loss

Thanks for the well thought out response, please don't take this follow up question as obtuse or dismissive I'm just interested to know what you think: How about stuff like Dead Girl or that Aubrey Plaza one where there's just one or two zombies?

How about zombies?

But it isn't underutilized at all, as pointed out by your examples. In video games there isn't as much of it as other stuff (in the West), but it's still swamping every other facet of culture to the point where I don't see how or why anyone could hunger for more of it in other mediums

How else am I going to hear crunching mixed with Build Me Up Buttercup or some shit

It looks like just a picture of a tape player on the bag, so I'm guessing the bag contains just the internal gadgetry ensconsed in an internal foil pouch or something, with no kind of case

Oh apologies, I wrote more and forgot I edited then

Oh, maybe I did I can't remember. What does the other sentence say?

This explains your standpoint in more verbose terms, but the 'why' is still lacking

Sooo…read the quote underneath that? And the sentence that follows that quote? Is only a bit of it showing up or something?