Yeah, it's not bad at all. You will be entertained
Yeah, it's not bad at all. You will be entertained
Amen brudda, I've run my mouth off about this multiple times recently, it does me good to see others feel the same. Insulting and irresponsible, Newswire has become the opposite of it's former self, and it's snowballing at a fast clip. Some guy asked me if I was looking at AV Club at work the other day and I said…
Me too…I can't believe I spent money on that garbage
I blame the title
It isn't really. I won't ruin anything for people that are going to see it but this review echoes the sentiments of everyone I know that has seen it (and also all reviews I have read, incidentally…I haven't read a positive one without a massive BUT somewhere in there)
Iggy trashed a movie he liked, then he forgot where he was and brought Ebert into it for some reason
Likewise, far surpassed my expectations
That's what I have found
That bubble bath idea is too good. Can't wait for this!
Dalton Wilcox is author of the book You Must Buy Your Wife At Least As Much Jewelry As You Buy Your Horse and Other Poems and Observations Humorous and Otherwise from a Life on the Range, he evidently has some fans here
Forgive me if I come across as short with you now, but I've lost patience, you are either not reading my posts and just guessing they say 1 sentence again and again, hence the woefully unsubstantial and unconvincing nature of your replies; or, you are, as claimed at the top (and to do you a favor), deliberately obtuse…
Apologies if the following seems insulting, but I honestly don't know how to convey the same information again:
I'm really not sure how you have missed the reason again. Are you kidding/trolling at this point, or is this just a matter of internet pride now?
Just saying 'it's were they were going and it's a key aspect of the story' doesn't make it so, I need a reason.
See I'm not sure you did read it then, because the confusion I refer to is in the abstract, a potential confusion. I outlined in detail where it stems from, so you at least know what I'm referring to. If you still don't think you can be deliberately obtuse sometimes, now would be a good time to reflect on that.
Do just read the passage before last again. This would be the obtuse nature as pointed out yesterday
As already stated in detail above, AVC could have referred to it by any other name and saved the confusion, were that their aim
I didn't mean to offend you by calling you obtuse, but you were responding in short sentences and I was having to tease every explanation out of you. I genuinely thought it was a deliberate move.
How have I demonstrated I have no understanding of reality? Do you truly find my posts nonsensical? You have been responding to them fine. Do you mean you disagree?
Why don't you try expressing whatever thought is making you lash out?