woodensword
WoodSword
woodensword

That would depend on how they worded it obviously. You don't have a very good [blah blah imagine your own empty conceited sentence, as you seem to enjoy those], do you?

Let's start with the headline

This one does, however, buy into the outdated and offensive suggestions that all metal fans are scary murdering nazis. Maybe you're right though: let's see if they write another article about nazism in other genres

…as a result of lots of articles telling people who are not interested in metal about the scary murdering nazi, that, as this is their entire exposure to metal, comes to define metal to them.

The two what?

We can participate in the threads as we are doing now, with the hope of getting our point across, albeit in a manner that gives the articles we don't like clicks. But when the AV Club can just release another bait article tomorrow, which will in turn produce a large number of comments, that validates the site's

Satanism is still there, is it? Doesn't seem to have had that profound an effect over the past 3 or 4 decades

I can't figure out if this is a joke or not

This article is so one-sided, timid and fogeyish, it's closer to the laughably ill-informed bleatings found in the Daily Mail.

Well if you can promise to recognize his fame as the result of the media blitz surrounding a murder and his multiple decades in the industry, as opposed to a wide-ranging appreciation for nazism, I promise not base my assumptions regarding Americans on the current most famous American, which was actually the result of

This article is so one-sided, timid and fogeyish, it's closer to the laughably ill-informed bleatings found in the Daily Mail.

I notice you don't mention them by name, so I'm guessing that's because 'most-famous' is a purposefully vague descriptor that doesn't really apply? Who are you talking about?

These days, AV Club isn't about appreciating culture so much as distancing themselves from huge swathes of it. I'm guessing their emergency PR guy told them they need to define their reader base

I'm guessing your point is that there's nazi everythings, not just metal bands, and that it's harmful and insulting to refer to 'metalheads' having a nazi problem, in which case I agree. Having read your comment a number of times, I'm struggling to find any other meaning or intent.

Well that's a viewpoint that suggests an open mind building bridges

expand on the boob groping

Standard writing stance for journalists and critics. They are referring to the publication

haha, thanks!

My issue isn't that they are not rigidly adhering to their sites descriptor, but that ultra featherweight 'choir-preaching', as you (fittingly) put it is actively detrimental. This kind of all-pervasive-react-not-think 'news' horseshit, and the resultant petty bickering, is exactly what a Trump administration wants.

The one with 'pop culture website' written above it? I'd rather stick around and complain about this site becoming a joke, so you're stuck with it