We’d all take a diseased pile of feces ahead of 45. Uncle Joe can still fuck directly off and stop trying to make things about him.

I hate to say it, but he did highlight an issue with men vs. women performers. How many guys perform in speedos and gyrate? You may get some crotch grabbing from some male dancers, but largely men are allowed to present themselves in non-sexual ways while being ugly as sin. It’s quite different if a woman tries that,…

Hi.
I understand a part of your post but I really dont get another big part:)
I understand to read someone you love saying horrible stuff can be a bitter experience but (here comes trouble)to resume a lifelong relationship to other people is beyond me. Dylan gave a lot of his songs to other people and particulary…

“Soyou’re not saying women shouldn’t be performers, are you?
No, absolutely not, man.”

Very large number of corporations have their u.s. hq in Delaware on paper, because of its laws being very nice for them, maybe this might have something to do with his power.

So was Emily Bett Rickards perhaps calling out another Arrowverse producer with her statement?

Megyn Kelly’s true self peaked out underneath all that new branding.

Did you see his Oscar winning turn in Beginners? At 87, he’s at the top of his game.

What he did is a definite pathology. It is a psychological aberation that he actually could be treated for.

He wasn’t their boss. In one case the victims were co-performers with him at a festival. Another instance involved a woman calling him to invite him to one of her shows, and he seemed to be masturbating on the phone. In a third, he was a guest star on a television pilot and she was a producer. The only case that comes…

Not really? I don’t know Schultz’s actual orientation and alignment and neither matter in the scheme of things, but her story does go to show that the patterns of abuse directed at and against women are not (a) unique to men or (b) primarily about sexual fulfillment. They’re about wielding power, letting off steam at…

I guess I don’t get how you can play the “we’re doing real journalism” card when the NY Times busted the story wide-open with 5 sources in what, a few weeks since the Weinstein stuff broke? And you’ve supposedly had it for years?

I’m commenting on my own comment because I had more to say. Watch that clip. Has the root of the message being delivered by Kimmel changed? I STILL see headlines like this on jezebel. It really bothers me that this website would get sanctimonious toward their readers when they post some of the headlines that they do.…

Maybe this very old clip will help you understand where some of the skepticism of your ethical standards originated. Jezebel (and Gawker) had legitimate journalism issues. And you know what? So does the NYTimes, WSJ, etc. You are held to higher standards and when you fail, you NEED to be called out on it. A lot of…

I enjoy that the response from the Jezebel writers on being called out is to just correct you on which news outlet broke the story <eyeroll>

To all the people saying it was the Times, I think the original commenter may be thinking of the Roy Moore story that broke today too. In either case, the Post and the Times went and found people willing to go on the record. They did not send out an open request, or a plea, or whatever you want to call it, and that’s…

“ She reached out to a Gawker reporter who’d previously gotten tips about it and learned the names of the two women who’d claimed that they’d experienced CK masturbate in front of them at the Aspen Comedy Festival around 2008.”

Here’s the simple fact: The Washington Post did journalism the right way, and Jezebel did not.

That painting is 100% a vintage Sweet Valley High cover. One of the ones with a lot of Bruce Patman in it.