It has no racial connotation you SJW cancer shit.

OR you are apart of the problem of disinformation, and stoking the fires of damaging the movement who support. It’s people like you who are more concerned with getting attention due to being the first with information before making sure it is correct that are gonna be pointed out as damaging the credibility of others…

Some police are in the hospital. Protesters don’t have a right to injure loot and put the safety of others at risk,

You actually can, select the one you want, then see all reviews, then in the “format” drop down menu, select “Show only reviews for x”.

People, generally speaking, take the time to complain about something but do not take the time to speak up when something goes right. That’s why cable companies, cell phone companies, and others like them seem like they have such poor service despite having massive user bases. If you didn’t have a problem with your…

In my human resource management classes, we were always instructed answer ONLY with confirmationn of whether a person worked their at a particular time and in a particular job. Nothing more, nothing less.

I recall that there were plenty of people who said maybe we should pump the brakes on this story since parts of it aren’t adding up. Granted, those people were tarred and feathered on Jezebel and Gawker, but they certainly existed. One particular person was roundly ridiculed for daring to question the story and…

Agreed. I mean, “Jackie” is clearly a lying nutjob but precisely because she’s a lying nutjob and a college student, the entirety of the blame for this shit-show lies with Rolling Stone.

you shoulda heard merlan when she defended the article.

Even people with journalism degrees from Columbia.

What’s a “Gawker”?

I searched “below average” and got a nice selfie.

You don’t know the half of it!

By far the most shocking thing about this is that a member or guest is disseminating photographs taken at the Grove. No matter how prominent he is, he should be banned for life.

“I have just resorted to ignoring what they say during meetings and then pardoning my memory loss by offering my own ideas”

and I would have supported them had they not tried to bilk money from **the families of shooting victims* but just the idea of what they did left me feeling ill.

“Trying to recoup exorbitant expenses having to defend themselves against frivolous lawsuits” is not “try[ing] to bilk money from the families of shooting victims.” This was ultimately a tactic Cinemark was using to pressure the litigants to agree not to appeal the ruling. Even getting here was very costly for them,…

I think we all expected this. The lawsuit was bullshit from the start, and frankly they should have taken the settlement that Cinemark offered that they absolutely did not deserve when they had the chance. I definitely do think it is nice of Cinemark not to seek these fees, since they have every right to do so under…