Yea, but this time his character is a Republican. And he has three daughters.

It's pretty funny.

I watch it every week

The Farrows are not like most families.

She was 19 or 21.

Of course it's weird. But it's two consenting adults entering into a relationship that has endured for more than 20 years.

That's actually a thing that didn't happen.

She had been legal for several years when they got together. No one actually knows her exact age, she was either 19 or 21.

I just flat out didn't like it and I'm the guy who found value in You Will Meet A Tall Dark Stranger.

The kids changing their names is well known. I really don't have a problem with it.

I hope for her sake she doesn't read comments sections.

I've read that Slate article before. Again, the whole thing is a he said she said thing. There's bad stuff on the anti-Woody side that Woody defenders will argue and there's bad stuff on the pro-Woody side that anti-Woody defenders will argue.

The name Dylan goes by now wasn't some big secret. He didn't void anything.

He banged a teen right?

They don't go to boarding school, they live with him.

Less widely disseminated was a news item that appeared in the New York Times five months later (Feb. 24, 1994), which reported that a disciplinary panel found the actions of County Prosecutor Frank Maco (the “probable cause” guy) were cause for “grave concern” and may have prejudiced the case. It winds up that Maco…

Woody was grooming Soon-Yi from an early age to be his child bride. Oh, come on! According to court documents and Mia’s own memoir, until 1990 (when Soon-Yi was 18 or 20), Woody “had little to do with any of the Previn children, (but) had the least to do with Soon-Yi” so Mia encouraged him to spend more time with her.…

Proof?

That DA really sounds awful.

That's something I've never bought and I remember there was a bit of a row over how some of the ethics of the DA with his comments.