willselfdestruct
WillSelfDestruct
willselfdestruct

It makes no sense that the Republican Party is able to sell itself as the family values, protect the children party when they continue to enable these tragedies. Most people agree with gun control. How do we keep ending up with leaders who think women should be controlled and forced to give up their lives for fetuses,

The GOP: We endorse spreading unfounded rumors about Jewish space lasers setting homes ablaze. But rumors about coke and sex orgies is where we draw the line.

Agreed and it reveals the end game. The goal is not to examine the extent of the baby formula scarcity or to argue for solutions. It is about the instinctive view of another group as unworthy. Therefore those babies are more deserving of a real or imagined hardship scenario of starvation than “God fearing, tax

It would help if journalists/commentariat who push the “it’s the economy” narrative took a clear look at their relatives and their communities which they coddle with this explanation. We are all feeling these scarcities together and the baby food scarcity is no different. Yet some people will get to say voting for the

The GOP use the distraction by stocking hate at another group tactic because it works so well. Guaranteed to ensure their base don’t notice the GOP either created the problem or is doing nothing to address it. And it works because that is exactly what the base wants. If anyone of any race/class/education/political

Health care expansion was popular with polls supporting 70-80% higher than support for abortion. Yes, the ACA became unpopular when the conservatives had a racist backlash to health care expansion plans that most of them supported and many already implemented in their states. By the time the racist “Obamacare” label,

Not to mention this majority lasted for all of 72 days. ACA that this writer now sneers at, was also widely popular. Yet it took all the democratic political capital available at the time to pass it. I am only a couple of years older than this writer. But the very online young lefty crowd are embarrassingly ignorant

The one upside to pride in the face of racism was that it was protective. Our beauty insecurities were not seen in white girl insecurities, so we got the “unfriendly black hotties” label. However, black girls were largely protected from the diet culture/pro ana culture of the 1990s/2000s. Black women were phat and

This is the republican mindset pathology: It happened to me, therefore it is a real problem. It happens to others? Not a problem.

You gotta respect this dude’s commitment to failing upwards loudly and publicly. It’s American meritocracy performance art. 

Indeed. Nobody should have to look at that punchable face everyday. But she will have him handled. She’s got that serene kill them with kindness poise. The clownery will only feed her youthful, highly melanated glow.

Good job, buddy. You can read, but still fail at comprehension. Jurists don’t have to reach to the 17th century to justify anti-roberry precedent. There is enough precedent in majority societal attitudes and legal rulings here and now to support an anti-roberry. Therefore anti-roberry rulings are not archaic or out of

FFS the point is not old equals bad. There are opinions then and now stating murder is wrong. You don’t have to reach back for support of that opinion now, because we all still agree that said opinion on murder equally protects us all. Having to reach all the way back 4-5 centuries because this century’s opinion on

The cruel nostalgia for the good old days of complete disregard for women’s lives is the point. Dude had to reach all the way back to the 17th century Puritanism for support of a ruling designed to affect 21st century lives. When they believed placing the father’s hat on a laboring woman’s belly relieved childbirth

Girl, stop. You didn’t even do the minimum of both siding. You set all the blame at democrat’s feet. By the way, when was the time Democrats had the super majority in both house and senate needed to codify abortion? For all the talk pretending otherwise, the Supreme Court is very much a political institution. The

Or one can do some basic reasoning and work out Team A keeps the current partial abortion access, expands health care partially and expanded voting rights partially. Versus team B who wants to erase any partial progress in these issues. Less than what you want is better than none of what you want. It’s pretty

Lol this is why democrats lose every time. Even when republicans gut you, y’all’s first instinct is to blame each other instead of rallying against the fuckers who just shanked your freedoms. Y’all are going to do this both sides bullshit and inertia yourself into losing congress in November too. Obergefell is next.

The Republican projection rule remains undefeated. If the GOP are wailing about it, best believe it is secretly their kink.

And Andrew Sullivan, Glenn Greenwald, Josh Barro. Actually may have been unfair to the broettes there. The bigotry bros have most of it well in hand. With assist from TERFs/lesbian TERFs, but only men are thought leaders”. Hence the erasure even when they are serving male supremacy.

This is on the white gay bros and broettes who went full transphobic, racist for anti-cancel culture and anti-CRT clout. Clowning it up with white supremacy because they thought gay marriage was safe and “settled”. Well. Surprise, motherfuckers.