@Kovitlac: Remember, your tattoo is...

@westau: And she did a REALLY shitty job despite that she worked at a tech company and "Generally people at tech companies are all pretty geeky" despite the fact that her job didn't require a knowledge of tech and she did a really shitty job at said company.

@reis_br: It rhymes with Dodo, as in dodo bird

@Tripleee: [www.huffingtonpost.com]

@huglis: Obvious troll is obvious

@westau: yeah, dude, she ran HP into the fucking ground. She's not exactly an example you'd want to use.

@Roekone: And That's the Fuckin Catalina Wine Mixer

@Tom_Servo: zach selwyn?

@baldbeaver: Fuck off

@Dragoona: I disagree

@RT100: How do you feel about vader?

@jepzilla: I think it was on purpose, it was a double negative. The context as provided by his next sentence implies that the meaning of the sentence you mentioned was that there is a lot to like. Saying "There's not much not to like" is just a roundabout way of saying that is a lot to like in this video.

Someone get these guys a thesaurus.

@ps61318: I don't know, didn't go into a burger king.

maybe you shouldn't use something that decays over time when making the thing that determines a physical constant!

@NixonsGhost:

@hoseklamp: I am assuming that the wall is completely immobile, and it would only travel away at the same speed if it was (A) not bolted down, (B) the same mass as the car, and (C) in a perfectly frictionless environment, if the wall were less massive than the car, it would fly away faster, if more massive, it would…

@JosephCole: it would be a perfectly elastic collision, the car will bounce backwards (assuming both the car and wall are a single piece, not structures made of smaller pieces) at the same speed at which it hit the wall.

@jayfreak1023: Oh hell naw, I gots myself a naturally occurring macro-lattice structure. The ladies can get all up with my hexagonal bond structure. Yo.

@Chinedu Opara: That may be, but I'm not no one. I'm someone. me.