I once witnessed this yutz from high school claiming on Facebook that anti-Semitic graffiti was probably done by "an extremist from either side". Ooooookay buddy. Tinfoil bullshit notwithstanding, being decent is now being an "extremist"! And, a "side"! The truth certainly must lie somewhere in the middle of racism…

But someone told me he USED TO BE A DEMOCRAT!!! Haven't you heard? Because he was once a Democrat, he's not REALLY horrible, and/or just became horrible a few years ago.

…I was never under the impression that every one of them isn't terrible.

Seriously, I do love how one very redeeming feature of this website is that Trumpfuckers are just firmly and unilaterally told to fuck off to somewhere where their vomit is welcome. We don't even mess with that shit for a second. It's refreshing.

Good love when they say "We will not allow you to trample our free speech!" when it's their Glorious Leader who is doing EXACTLY that. It would be hilarious if it weren't so sad, wouldn't it? Never mind that also, as has been pointed out to them five zillion times already, ONLY the government can trample free speech…

But, but, but, I want PROOOOOOOF that Trump is a racist! Liberals just like to throw the word "racist" around like it's nothing! Never mind that the proof in his case is literally "just about every fucking thing he's ever said in his entire life!" I'm not paying attention, and won't accept any answer that's given…

Waahh, Waahh, Waahh, Waahh. "The things I object to you saying are the inferences that can be drawn directly from my response. Also, I'm still not even going to bother answering a damn question you asked, or even making an attempt to actually refute any of the assertions I'm making a show of being so upset about. I'm…

Ok, thanks. This kind of response is really all I was looking for. Apparently, that's too hard for some people, and was like pulling teeth to get.

You know what, I now regret ever coming into this thread to try to explain rationally why I don't believe MJ did what he was accused of. I thought "insane MJ fanboys" was just an epithet leveled at people who weren't convinced by the evidence, but no, insane MJ fanboys actually are a thing, and you're fucking creepy.…

No, I'm pretty sure I didn't say that. Stop twisting my words. If your reason for disliking them is rational, it should hold up to scrutiny.

So, you admit you're automatically and preemptively opposed to anything they put out. Why should they care what you think, again? You and your buddy here. Why are you the boss of when their career must end?

"Waaaaahhhhhh, it's LOOOOOOOOONNGGG, I can't be bothered to defend my viewpoint anymore!" I know, four paragraphs, totally more than we should ever be expected to read and respond to in a lifetime. IF IT'S MORE THAN 140 CHARACTERS I CAN'T BE BOTHERED

And I gave my honest response to your response. Maybe YOU "calm down".

Which folks? "Insane fanboys", or people who never felt much about Michael Jackson one way or the other, but found the evidence in the cases against him to be wanting, and think that it's a gargantuan leap of logic, and a bit worrisome, to go from "This guy is pretty weird" to "This guy definitely banged kids"?

The definition of "innocent" is that you DEFINITELY DIDN'T do it. "Not guilty" doesn't mean that you necessarily DIDN'T do it, it means that they didn't find you guilty.

Someone known for being AVC's liberal lion is making a statement like "But that doesn't change the fact that he liked to rape little boys, and got away with it because of he was rich and famous"? Really? I'm disappointed in you. I'd have expected better.

He wasn't "proven innocent", and I am so sick of hearing that phrase, because that's not how the law system works in America. People are not "proven innocent" in a court of law. They are found, not guilty.

You see, Christopher here is one of those edgy mofos whose reaction to anything and everything Metallica does has been a reflexive, unchanging, reliable-as-clockwork "This sucks!" since 1996. But, see, it's the BAND who have become parodies of themselves.

So, you get to be the boss of how long musicians are allowed to continue making music? Or is it just metal musicians because you think they're a special case? What separates the bands that SHOULD go on indefinitely, in your opinion, from the ones who shouldn't?

I haven't heard Lulu, so I can't comment on it.