Well usually there's a clear indication that a company is readying a reveal of a new console.

Yeah, this seems very Sega Add-on to me.

I can't believe people are supporting Nintendo on this reveal. I would be pissed if my previous purchase of a 3DS was suddenly invalidated by a completely new hardware reveal.

Thank god I'm not the only here who realized the same thing. Nintendo gets away with a lot of shit that Sony & MS wouldn't be able to.

The whole thing about needing to upgrade to play certain games is awful, and I feel that if Sony or MS tried to pull the same thing there would be hell to pay.

Nintendo... giving us all the hardware we don't want and none of the games we do.

It's called the "new" 3DS and the "new" 3DS LL. It's faster with "new" 3DS viewing. It also has "Amiibo" function and a new analog pad call the "C-stick."

So, no full 3DS compatibility due to second stick and second set of shoulder buttons?

I really hate this.
I mean I appreciate them improving on the console, but surely they should have just play tested it, got the feedback and then improved it in the first place?

I waited to get an XL because I expected it, but I didn't expect another new model :/

I need that Crows shirt in my life.

It won't run? Wtf why? You have the capable hardware right? Like CPU and everything? Ram?

That's not Valve's job to make sure other people's games run on everybody's hardware. You were a rare case where something is fucked up with your computer so that you wouldn't play it. It's not worth it for Valve to be offering refunds for the rare times that happens (other time's it's entirely your fault for not…

It's really hard to have legitimate conversations about stuff like this because people always lean towards one extreme and it's so difficult to find middle ground and talk about it like an adult. It's like those rare times you talk about religion or politics on the internet without the world imploding.

Why is it that ALL rational debate about her is dismissed as violent and misogynistic? Why is it that no one seems to talk about the people who bring up rational arguments with the flaws in some of her arguments and the method in which she argues?

I find the majority of sarkeesians arguments to be poorly grounded and trite, however in no way does that justify the acts of the people attacking her

See, this bugs me quite a bit. Back when she released her first video, I felt there were some problems with it, so, as best I could, I explained why I felt that way. People chose to take it as "concern trolling," and much, much worse. Her defenders, at the time, remind me of the same people who attack and deride her.

You nailed it. Let's be best friends.

Calling the trolls harassing her "rational debate" is indeed insulting to rational debate. But the issue is that the attempts at rational debate also get labeled as harassment/misogyny/trolling by the SJW crowd who apparently can't fathom that anything Anita would say might be factually incorrect or even debatable.

Pour one out.