No. Because not all words are perfectly literal.
No. Because not all words are perfectly literal.
Generally it does. there are 2 biological motivations for heterosexual sex.
Original jeeps had full time 4WD maybe some other old vehicles did.
Any man who wants to have sex with a visibly pregnant woman - who isnt the father or in a relationship with her - has issues.
It ridiculous but it has been a thing for at least 35 years probably longer.
Unless your vehicle is 40 or 50 or more years old you do NOT own a full time “4WD.” No matter what thead copy calls it.
i agree. But Im sick of it being presented with this proprietary nonsense.
Y U bring race into it?
Im kind of sick of thee stories that pay WAY too much attention to local claims.
This is the sort of stupid misuse of a word “colonize” that dilutes and destroys the words power.
uuhhhh - no
If you dont like beer in general but you dont mind other alcohol - then you dont like hops.
Or you could just say that any vehicle with the ability to lock the front and rear together is a 4wd
Im not specifically familiar with a RAV4 - but just because its a light passenger SUV doesnt mean it cant technically be a 4wd
I made no distinction between part and full time for 4wd
Except its not splitting hairs. living with a 4WD is a fundamentally different experience than living with an AWD.
This is a bad take.
Cats are filthy animals - feed it to a dog.
It doesnt matter what race/religion is involved a group of unhappy teenage boys gathering in close around a person they are unhappy with is bad news.
This article is really underselling what a fuck up D3 was.