Especially if it’s suspected the driver causing the accident is under the influence. Even more so if the person is wandering around saying people are trying to kill him and someone is coming to fix his car that’s in the middle of the road after crashing it into someone else and saying he lost his key.

I understand the spirit of “don’t send police to car accident scenes”, but it doesn’t seem practical since legal/insurance matters are referred by police, not fire or ambulance personnel. Especially if the accident was the result of a serious crime

I think most would be smart enough not to enter a country and break a law. I think we all can agree 10 years for what she did is stupid, but some refuse to believe she even broke a law, which is clear as day. 

I didn’t agree with McCain on much politically but to pretend like anything Griner did was more heroic than McCain’s time as a POW is pretty wild.

Are we sure that it’s not actually an award for the Dumbest Arizonian Of The Year?

I don’t think you have to be especially conservative to think that getting busted for drugs in a foreign country, leading to release of one of the world’s most dangerous arms dealers to get her out, may not qualify someone for a Person of the Year award.

came here to say this.  At least a token spot... kids these days, no respect... 

This list is completely invalid for not having that as #1 on the list. It’s in-depth, and actually shows you how things are done instead of having splashy montages. 

No love for “This Old House??” it shows you how to DO the remodels.

For what?  She smuggled drugs and got an arms dealer released.  Bravo I suppose...

LOL. Liberals and their Victim of the Year awards. It’s like that Simpsons episode about the boy who falls in a well. Homer: “He’s a hero!” Lisa: “How is he a hero?” Homer: “He fell in a well. It’s more than you did!”

The clickbaitiness of the title is all that really matters here. Hell, my first reaction was also “Her? Really?! All she did was get arrested...”

Some police just don’t care about Black lives and because they don’t, they should be held accountable when they take them.

This last one isn’t so much a hack as an oft-repeated platitude: “It’s not a diet, it’s a lifestyle change.” If you’re trying to lose weight, please do not make this a lifelong process.

“After all, it would not be healthy or smart to lose weight forever. Since the way we lose weight is by eating fewer calories than we burn, the exact meals and habits that help us lose weight are not going to be the ones that help us maintain our ideal weight once we get there. At the very least, you’ll have to…

But you somewhat do... don’t you remember Mendel’s punnett squares? In selective breeding you’re still playing with the same base-pairs which could also occur naturally. You may be placing them in proximity/forcing the two to combine but it is still cross breeding peas you’re not modifying the DNA.

While an argument can be made that selective breeding is manipulation of genes, it does not meet the legal or trade definitions of a genetically modified organism.

Look for Keith Reed’s new story on this topic “If You Are Mad Latarsha L. Sanders Killed Her Children For Voodoo, Cry More.”

Considering that isn’t genetic modification, but rather selective breeding, they would beat you with the preserved hand of Gregor Mendel. Now if someone busted out a plasmid to introduce new information in (such as adding in a gene to signal via color change when cold damage is present) then that would be allowed. You…

“And let’s not get into the NFL owners making loads of dough off of young black men breaking their bodies for entertainment”