whiggly
Whiggly
whiggly

FYI,

There seems to be a trend of people claiming to have apologized and done their time after, as far as I can tell, not apologizing or paying in any way. I guess “it was not me, I apologize” in a sympathetic interview two years later kind of counts if you squint, but that’s a stretch given that she’s pretty evasive about

The virus will happily use any opening created in order to infect anything vulnerable to it.

January and February are when winter gets fun, as it’s finally pure, dry snow you can play with and ski around on.

Silicone can take some heat, but not flame.

A lot of misinformation here.

Considering how much we’re finding was successfully covered up before he went on instagram and twitter, that person clearly exists but is severely overworked.

He’s important enough that there’s been a very noticeable increase in antisemitism after his (public) outbursts started, including violence and graffiti explicitly citing him as inspiration. He might lose a lot of his place in polite company, but he’s likely to remain at least a gateway to fringe/hate beliefs.

I know sports reporting has a certain tone and his having his called it a mistake somewhat blunts repercussions, but why does this writeup make it sound like the worst part about the possibility of a prominent athlete endorsing and egging on an antisemitic hate group with a history of violent terrorism would be the

Goyim are weird.

They want to connect antisemites to antisemitism, go figure. You’re no different from David Duke whining that he didn’t personally own slaves.

It’s a very good thing I don’t use social media, as I keep getting these two’s (is that the right way to write this?) names confused with each other and Mastriano’s and Shapiro’s and would be posting things that would be completely insane by constantly referring to the wrong person and getting what stories were about

While not from LA, I suspect your first part might be slightly outdated due to the Supreme Court specifically outlawing “may issue” permitting.

Maybe it’s that I think “gun rights” are hilariously overinflated, but I think brandishing a deadly weapon immediately justifying self defense is a reasonable legal standard.

It’s actually slightly off, being either “wuh-STAH” or “wih-STAH” depending on where you are.

My money was on overtime fraud, which staties and multiple local departments have been caught doing, largely on traffic flagging details because a state law makes it difficult to hire civilian flaggers.

Woman King is the only one I’ve been hearing a lot of buzz about, but I feel like monarch pictures tend to not net a lot of acting awards because they don’t give a lot of range beyond standing with gravitas (“is Cate Blanchet good or just tall?”). Till may have more chance, although I haven’t heard much about it, as

It seems to be a continuation of his trans statement thesis that stuff can fly on black people but incredibly mild things about other groups getr huge pushback, but completely misses in saying that you can’t say “The Jews” that absolutely nobody has survived saying “the blacks” and that the Jews Don’t Count issue is a

This will also be interesting to watch from the perspective of Charles’ regal theory, as the queen was always insanely circumspect about anything of any real significance (essentially seeing her role as having more platform and policy weight than it deserves) while Charles has been more outspoken (both for good, being

I think it’s like how the Oprah Book Club and her show are criticized for promoting various works and their authors that people aren’t bothered by Amazon having. A similar comparison could be made to you being more angry at the person who convinced you Twilight would be a good read than the library not stopping you