Note that several provinces also prevent abortions after 12 weeks and that the rights in Canada is similarly in place by court precedent rather than law.
Whiggly
whiggly
Looking at Canadian politics, 90% or policy stances seem to be to either emulate or differentiate from America. The other 10% is adopting multiculturalism to spite the French (who were trying to get equal precedence with English, which was headed off by eliminating privileges and letting English Canadian be de facto…
That’s completely missing the point that the ability to publish this article is directly because the First Amendment carried incontrovertible legal weight. The argument isn’t about whether to like everything in the constitution but whether it’s good that it is followed when it is the law (or, more accurately,…
The alternative is Quebec’s ban on public employees wearing kippot and headscarves, though. I’d prefer my company not require me to run off to the smoking shed if I need to squeeze in a mincha.
Because it’s the document saying that Trump can’t abolish the Senate and have himself crowned emperor. You might as well complain about Henry Ford’s politics becasuse your your mechanic is telling you your car can’t run on cola.
Yes, how dare a judge base his decision on constitutionality.
Young very-online people hate landlords because there aren’t young very-online landlords (they instead went into tech and moved to expensive zip codes). Also, landlords are employed with steady incomes, so they’re also well outside of the involuntarily unemployed (“antiwork” and iphone commies) crowd. It’s basically…
She continues to have the analytical depth of a twitter slogan. Every candidate is careful to say that he can’t comment on how he’ll rule on possible future cases because he has no way of knowing what those cases and arguments might be and opining in principal would undermine his impartiality in future cases. Even a…
THOMAS , J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS , C. J., and ALITO , G ORSUCH, K AVANAUGH, and BARRETT , JJ., joined. ALITO, J., filed a concurring opinion. KAVANAUGH, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which ROBERTS , C. J., joined.
So can we talk about how bonkers it is that the gun ruling appears to have a different opinion from each justice? What the hell is a lower court supposed to do with that?
To be fair, the elections he won had a lot of the splitting bullshit you usually only see in parliamentary systems.
Because the writers decided to replace pseudo-Viking theming with blaxploitation and urban culture references in a cutesy postmodernist manner as a solution to the problem of what an African American (not African... or Afro-Caribbean which is a whole other issue here) version of Asgard should be rather than a love or…
I can kind of see what they were going for, trying to solve the issue of Thor not being someone who just randomly got powers and was thrown into the character’s tropes but rather someone actually from a specific setting by completely redoing that world. I can also see how doing that in an authentic manner was…
Well, yeah, older people die more.
How he’s made a clear path to nearly representing Georgia in the Senate is beyond, well, all of us.
Genetic variance in calorie-weight relationships are fairly negligible, and likewise hormonal problems are incredibly rare and typically pretty small.
It seems a little weird that the court didn’t use the building being a bed and breakfast, such that the officer had entered a public area (and so had to be asked to leave), to dodge the 6-3 decision.
Stalin was planning a genocide when he dies. Other administrations were little better. This is somewhat conflating communism and socialism based on her ideology, but you’re similarly conflating socialism and social democracy.
I think it’s like Ayn Rand, whose Jewishness was very obviously tertiary to her hatred of socialism (even though Jewishness was one of the main things targeted under socialism).
When talking about how politicians choose positions, yeah. It’s not even specific to American parties.