whereisgawker
WhereIsGawker
whereisgawker

Good, so we’re in agreement that they use dangerous tactics because they think the ends justify the means. That makes them radicals.

Give however many shits you want, but it’s a blatant lie to insist they’re not radicals when their activism involves creating illegal international incidents that endanger everyone around them.

They are absolutely radical. The ends don’t always justify the means. If you see someone you believe is breaking the law but that the relevant authorities can’t come to a conclusion to prosecute, you don’t get to just ram them with your car in a vigilante effort to restore your personal perception of justice.

Next time you’re in traffic and someone forgets to signal a lane change, make sure you ram their car at speed and pelt the passengers with acid bombs. Just tell the cops that you weren’t being radical.

They also ram ships and attack the sailors. Regularly. Shit, there was an entire TV show where that was all they did.

Question, would it be fiscally responsible to design a building using tax dollars to withstand an event that may never happen again and not be able to fully rebuild? Or use those dollars to rebuild exactly was was lost (at less cost than the alternative 100-500 year design spec) with the possibility it may happen

Might not matter. The national flood insurance program has been broken for years. Getting a payout is extremely difficult after one of these events, and there’s the potential that the program could go broke over an event like this.

yep the fact that no one has figured this out yet is appaling. there is alot more to towing a trailer full of stuff than just low-stacked weights. enclosed trailers pull WAAAAAAAAAAAAAY different than an open trailer.

Worked for a company for about 4 years that did testing on mules similar to these in Colorado. Our trailers were identical to this, but with the addition of thick plexiglass on the ‘grid’. The purpose as I was told was to add additional wind resistance to the trailer to simulate worst case scenario for towing.

Because they’re idiots.

Good car, too much understeer

Godzilla never dies.

fast boats are like supercars. the hardware is sweet but the scene is ripe with douchebags. That being said there is something really REALLY special about turning the key and hearing a glorious v8 come to life......and then, in the greatest “but wait theres more” moment of all time, reaching for the second key and

If Jeep goes, the rest of the company will have to be dismantled quickly as its hard to see how FCA could survive at all without it. Sell Jeep to Great Wall, Alfa Romeo to Volkswagen, Maserati and Ram to, um, others, and give away Chrysler, Dodge, and Fiat essentially free to some management group that wants to take a

Wrangler leases are kind of their own thing, because there isn’t another car in its class.

According to everyone who supports this tech, it will be so advanced that it will never fail and can never be compromised.

I suspect the longer wheelbase will enable a higher tow rating, but who knows. I’d rather get an old Gladiator myself.

He’s in the middle of a parking lot. I think you can relax on this one.

You’re just upset that I tore apart your argument with a screenshot of the definition of the word you were arguing about.

Restricting movement is restricting movement. No matter how you slice it.