Support for friends who commit crimes is perfectly fine privately, but most crimes don’t deserve public support and to act like the person is innocent, automatically, and that they could NEVER do it and that’s “not the person I know and love!”
Support for friends who commit crimes is perfectly fine privately, but most crimes don’t deserve public support and to act like the person is innocent, automatically, and that they could NEVER do it and that’s “not the person I know and love!”
Yep, but it’s also not nearly as simple as that, either. This requires quite a bit of work for numerous reasons.
You know, it’s funny. Republicans aren’t libertarians. So, the only reason they’re doing this is so when hundreds of thousands of people die from an inevitable, catastrophic outbreak, people will run back to government sanctioned vaccinations.
Harassment is not covered by free speech. However, it’s that this law did not DEFINE PROPERLY what harassment constitutes.
How is it not overspending to explicitly develop a fucking vehicle you don’t need?
Yeah. OH! You got them! POW! Except, you know, PR couldn’t afford them even if they wanted them. Then, the federal government couldn’t be bothered to use anything like that for such things, certainly not under Republican Terrorism Regimes. Closest would be if the Guard bought them. That’s it.
Chewy has morons for packers. They’ll put 40 pounds of litter on top of a bag of food instead of the food on top of the litter. What this does is during shipping your bags pop. (they’ll do this with almost anything heavy that’s also in the box)
Chewy has morons for packers. They’ll put 40 pounds of litter on top of a bag of food instead of the food on top of…
There’s nothing disturbing about it. There isn’t an epidemic among “ancient” craft when it comes to crashes. It’s still, EASILY, the safest travel method for cargo. Fewest fatalities and incidents. Although, naturally, there are more incidents with Cargo planes than passenger. Still, the track record still speaks for…
This article inadvertently sums up Reggie perfectly. It’s not one about his leadership but his PR front man purpose for NOA. He wasn’t a leader. He was a Nintendo of Japan Yesman.
It was his job to persuade Nintendo of Japan to not make that easily identifable mistake in the first place, at least in his market. Just what did he do to save it? Seems to me all that maneuvering wasn’t from NOA but from Nintendo of Japan...
I swear, all these pearl clenching articles is making it like we’re growing up in the turn of the industrial revolution, not 21st century...
Any government subsidizing game development would do well to steer clear of mobile studios. Mobile and F2P developer jobs are the least stable development jobs in this industry. Even when the game hits the lottery, staffs get cut. Consistently and categorically.
Solution is simple. Create a proper Presidential Records law. Fucking done. You fucking moron voters. Who knew you need to be in contact with your representatives to be REPRESENTED.
Well, Kudos to them for trying something, slightly, different. But they’re still pillaging the mindless Sims community with how an expansion pack isn’t as full as it once was and you basically need to buy a game pack or two, in addition to the expansion pack, to get a proper update in content and features.
I don’t think people realize how poorly Reggie has done, either. Wii-U should never have happened. It should have never been called that in NA. It was his EXPLICIT job to make sure that something so avoidable wouldn’t happen in his market. The name alone caused mass confusion among the people they were targeting that…
I wouldn’t categorically reject the notion but I will say that I didn’t “get” DOA until I realized it wasn’t Soul Calibur and that some mainstream fighters aren’t exactly always offensively minded.
I like reading these articles before seeing who wrote it and guess if I knew who wrote it. Once I saw costume unlocks, I knew who I was dealing with :)
I’d like thin ones but not for any calories savings. I mean, if I had self control that’d be nice, but I sure as hell don’t and them being thinner gives them a much bigger binging threat. Which, of course, these companies know and pray for.
That’s a pretty bad idea for so many reasons when it comes to wildlife study... Definitively so, in this use case.
Most think they want a big battery until they feel the difference in weight. While it’s certainly nice to have options, unless you’re a phone-use whore, most aren’t, you’re not likely to appreciate that extra weight after a week of actually living with it. People also seem to forget that as phones got bigger so did…