whatisuptampa
whatisuptampa
whatisuptampa

Now I am curious for your definition of sexual objectification ?

Agree, it is less likey, but that is your choice to believe sexual objectification is or is not taking place. A man finding a woman attractive is not objectification, nor is a woman finding another woman attractive. It becomes objectification when it is assumed an individuals sexuality is responsible for their

Do you believe that women never flirt with men in the workplace? It is not aggression to call a woman “stunning”. LinkedIn may have started as a professional work related platform, but it has morphed, by their own design into something much more social. You believe he was implying her success was due to her

Men and women fuck. Women are fuckable. A man making an unwelcome flirtatious comment does not equal misogyny. She doesn’t work for him, they aren’t in the workplace, he isn’t attempting to coerce her into sex for workplace advancement, nor doe his comments demean her professional status. He saw a picture which he

Individuals make attempts to flirt. Sometimes it is expected and wanted, sometimes not. We have become so critical of the smallest comments, it is maddening.

I agree. But it is most certainly not misogyny.

Why is it ok for a woman to compliment another woman on her appearance but not a man?

Telling a woman she looks stunning in a picture is not misogyny. It may be inappropriate on Linkedin, it may mark you as an ass and creepy, but please can we stop with the over the top micro-aggression bullshit. The guy was clearly trying to flirt, he didn’t pull it off, and he certainly shouldn’t be labeled with such

Absolutely agree. You are admitting intellectual defeat when you refuse to engage with someone who holds a differing point of view, no matter how offensive you may find it. Fran Lebowitz:

You are asking the wrong question. The real question is - Why are jobs at fast food establishments (and similar) now necessary to take as adults looking to support themselves and their families? Reasons are sundry, but here is a good start looking at abusive HB visa programs:

Here is a great article from 2009 in the NYT from varying perspectives. They are spending nearly 40% of their operating budget on pension costs, clearly unsustainable.

Maybe Kye can locate Hilary Clinton's deleted emails.

Your construct implies that the higher earning majors, engineering and such, have the qualities you describe - "brutally long hours, physical labor, and bread winning" None of which universally apply to the higher earning majors from the study. Woman may in fact earn less than men as a group, but this difference is

I didn’t realize being an engineer was a physically taxing profession.

Are you disputing the premise that different college major selections lead to different salaries later in life? I think it is easy to acknowledge a petroleum engineer will usually earn more than a social worker.

Agree, and it gives me hope to see the left leaning staff demonstrating some actual desire to print the truth. Although reading the comment section confirms the faithful lemmings marching along.

Actually give Gawker media the credit for breaking this story months before the big media outlets had it on their radar. Gawker actually went as far as to start litigation to get the facts in the story.

This is absolutely a valuable feature. There is a difference between a 12 y/o and an 18y/o when it comes to privacy. My 12y/o knows he has no privacy on his computer, he doesn't expect it nor does he yet deserve it, this will change as he gets older and I feel he can responsibly interact through the internet. This is

What use is PP if they charge $1200 for an IUD insertion? Where does the funding go?

What you left out: having a doula doubles your risk of having a C-section. A birth plan is like Mike Tyson said "Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth" Much better to plan for the epidural and enjoy what science has to offer.