Well, the article says “period-accurate 1998 gaming rig”, so something that wasn’t out in 1998 wouldn’t be accurate. Even a Pentium III wouldn’t be accurate as it didn’t release until 1999. Not that it really matters lol. It’ll run the games without any need for emulation, so it’s old enough : )

“No, that’s what the term Dyson swarm refers to.”

“Meanwhile, not one person in this comment section has been able to explain why Newton’s 3rd behaves the way it does.”

I’m a little late to the party, and only read through about half of these replies, so forgive me if someone has stated something similar... but lets do a simple thought experiment to take the complexities out of the issue.

Wait. What now? In what way are the earnings not split? If a video earns $100 in payable ad revenue, and only has 1 claim, that party get’s the full $100, yes? But if there are 4 claims on the same video, each party wouldn’t get $100, because that would mean the video was paying out 4 times what it has earned. So,…