Misogynists aren't interested in thinking critically about gender roles. I don't really care if they can't distinguish between the acceptable range of human emotion and misogynist temper tantrums that get mocked by us. Being nice to them doesn't help. Believe me. I've tried it. So, angry man children get mocked…

I feel empathy for anyone experiencing genuine suffering. That isn't what manfeels are. Manfeels would be something like a man whining about how unfair it is that women want to be left alone on public transportation because of all the harassment we experience on it.

Same. Women after to worry about rape, sexual harassment, domestic violence, catcalling, discrimination at work, access to BC and abortion care, etc. etc. But some manfeels are hurt. DROP EVERYTHING!!! MANFEELS ALERT!!!

I just used this gif on Gawker, so why not CTRL + V that shit again.

Graft versus host is a serious disease.

You missed the point, dear. I'm saying that the notion that women are delicate flowers who can't or shouldn't do manual labor came from patriarchy. Not women.

Feel free to read the things written by MRAs or talk to one. I comment regularly on a blog exclusively devoted to mocking misogyny and they rage wank about it all the time.

If anyone is driven away from feminism by a Jezebel headline it's because they were looking for an excuse to oppose it. People who are looking for information that supports their biases will always find it or make some up anyway.

I never claimed it was well written. I don't think it was. But it's rather silly for them to spend years complaining about it. Especially after MRA leader Paul Elam responded to it by suggesting they celebrate "bash a violent bitch month."

I didn't say it was good. My point was that it's pathetic to still be whining about it. Internet manchildren love to complain about "misandry" but shit like that is they best they can do. Examples of misogyny in the media can be found constantly. MRAs complain about a years old Jezebel post and the decades old…

It's not our fault that men were stupid enough to push women out of careers (dangerous or not) and all the war fighting and then were stupid enough to complain about women not doing dangerous work and fighting in wars. You've also forgotten that women have been working and contributing throughout human history and…

If you're such a brilliant STEM manly man, you should be aware that your anecdote about your kids is not data. You should also realize that studying mechanical engineering does not confer any expertise in the social sciences on you. Being good at math does not mean you're right about everything else.

Anti-feminists are mad at the notion that women might want to do something with their lives besides boner pleasing and sammich making. This article isn't making or breaking that.

They are still whining about that satirical article from 2007 in which the writers abuse their boyfriends.

Internet misogynists do so love their evo psych.

Nobody can do side eye like the Queen Mum. I'm talking about Catelyn Stark of course. How has nobody paid tribute to her yet?

I have a soft spot for Adrienne because she's an A Song of Ice and Fire and Game of Thrones nerd and so am I. But Elise was a way better model. I also liked her personality better but realize that snarky atheist is a tough sell with a lot of people.

No. I couldn't bring myself to even watch the sex tape.

Does Screech have Screechlets yet?