Our laws are based on the constitution, not the bible. When you start a business, you are agreeing to follow our laws.
Our laws are based on the constitution, not the bible. When you start a business, you are agreeing to follow our laws.
You're a natural at misandering! I'm sure you'll do just fine.
Do you think EGALITARIAN52d is Elliot Rodger's ghost?
Call the Feminist High Council at 1 800 KILL ALL MEN for more details. Just be aware you do have to fulfill a misandry quota each in order to retain your female privileges. Don't worry though, it's easy. All you have to do is not smile at a man. Or wear earbuds on public transit.
Oh good. You're ableist as well as a misogynist. Care to throw in some racism and homophobia? Just so the vileness circle is complete.
In MRAland, YouTube is a valid scientific source. Then again, they think facts they pull out of their own asses are good sources too so I guess YouTube is a step up for them.
Out of curiosity, why are you even asking him? All MRAs have the exact same talking points. If you've seen one MRA rage wank, you've seen them all.
Misogynists always call women "females." It's meant to dehumanize us I think.
P.s. If you want thin privilege there is a way to get it
Anorexia can cause fertility problems but thin women who are not anorexic are just as fertile as any other woman. I also think it's highly problematic to equate womanhood with fertility. Do we stop being women if we are infertile, have a hysterectomy or hit menopause? Considering that a lot of woman who have…
I guess it depends on who's using the term. Red pillers and Christian fundies have different ideas about what a "real man" is although both versions are patriarchal and narrow. The point is, all women are real women and all men are real men.
In my experience, men who talk about how great chivalry is are always jerks. They always buy into patriarchal gender roles, particularly the virgin-whore dichotomy and really only want to be "chivalrous" to a woman as long as he can pedastalize her. It all goes out the window when it's revealed the objects of their…
Honestly, I think most people see their own body type as average. But I don't know either. We don't come in small, medium and large there's such a variety of female shapes that normal just doesn't even exist.
Real men isn't a good term either though. Men who don't fit into the alpha male ideal get called that and that's not cool.
It still implies that certain shapes aren't correct for women to have. For most people, a model body is not attainable. That doesn't mean their bodies aren't real. Keep in mind that most tall thin women are also average women and not glamorous models. There's no need to harm them as collateral damage when…
Are you one person using multiple accounts that always posts this in stories about fashion. Or are there just a whole lot of Marc Jacobs conspiracy theorists out there?
True. Kendall Jenner has nothing on Coco Rocha. Not Iman or Christy Turlington either.
I think it's both. There was definitely implied homophobia in the term "metrosexual." As if real manly straight men don't put effort into their appearances.
No. That's why I said aristocratic. That's not really the point though is it? The wealthy will always be more into fashion than the poor because they can afford it and don't need to dress practically. That's true now too. Don't conflate class and gender. Your claim was that the reason women are held to higher…