So when Israel has settlers surrounding all of their military outposts near the world’s largest open air prison, that’s not using human shields?

You just created this account today. You will not face any real-world consequences for posting anything. I can only conclude that you have no such links to post because no such videos exist.

Oh, so Israel can kill whoever it wants to so long as “it’s not their mission”. Who cares if Israel “accidentally” kills thousands? Because Israeli officials claim that Hamas “deliberately” targets civilians. And we should just believe them.

Post a link

Military targets? Really? They have bombed schools, hospitals, churches. Unicef has lost connection with it’s personel, many UN officials died.

I defy you to provide proof that anything you mentioned actually happened. Show me the proof of women being raped. Show me the proof of babies being torn from their mothers wombs. Why can we take Israel at its word but not the Gazan health ministry?

Please explain to me how Hamas are terrorists for killing civilians but the IDF aren’t. Because the IDF has already killed literally thousands of civilians in their bombing of Gaza. Why aren’t they terrorists, too?

Do you happen to have any idea how many Palestinian children are currently in Israeli custody? (hint: it’s at least one order of magnitude higher than the number of children currently being held by Hamas.)

What makes Hamas’ killing of civilians any more terroristic than the IDF’s? Because the IDF has already killed well over 3,000 children since October 7th.Why can they kill civilians but Hamas can’t?

They were elected, just like Bibi was elected!

What’s the issue?

Still waiting on your name and address. My hammer is ready. Is your skull?

“Cancel Culture” exists across the political spectrum (cf. Bud Light). “Cancel Results” are something else entirely . . .

Oh God, I thought we had moved past this kind of thing around 2016, when Lindy West appointed herself emperor of jokes. There’s nothing inconsistent about thinking a subject is serious and making a joke about it. And nothing in my joke suggests that abuse victims should be doubted or that abusers should not be…

It’s always the person you least suspect. Here, Brand is the person you most suspect, which makes you think you shouldn’t suspect him, which makes him the person you least suspect.

The Dems have shown that they are unwilling to try anything to mitigate the power of a court which is already lost for at least a generation. We already know they’re not gonna pack the court or try to reign in judicial review.

So what are the Democrats actually gonna do, though? What is the response to this attempt to “divide and conquer”? Do they plan on offering something to voters to give them a reason to support them, or are they just gonna stick with guilt and scare-mongering about Republican fascism?

lolwut? His rationale may be ridiculous but anything to hamper the US war machine is objectively good for humanity.

The wheelchair kid from Degrassi.

Also, if I didn’t read those lyrics and just heard them, I’d be confused by that line. “Miners on an island? Is he talking about outsourcing jobs?”