weapon-a
weapon-a the first try suffers no trolls
weapon-a

Wow.... The reason I continued commenting past my initial comment, was because I thought I was communicating with someone who was taking the time to actually read what I’d written. I wrote very early on in my comments that though I also don’t like eating with damned animals, I wouldn’t have reacted the same way she

“But to your point, no one is forced to eat with service animals—you can leave or you can move spots.”

“In public, you don’t have “personal space” that’s why it’s called public.”

I’m aware. My point was there must be a point at which expecting people to “just deal with it” is no longer reasonable. For the woman in the post, it’s a big arsed dog next to her when she eats. While it can be argued that she simply has to learn to deal with this changing world, I’m not sure the same argument works

Just watched the video again... I still don’t know if someone called her the N word, but someone said or did something that brought her back into the restaurant. The staff told her more than once “dont like it, leave”, to which she replied “I am”. She didn’t simply get up to leave and then decide to wild the fuck out,

I have my doubts too. Not because she didn’t mention anyone’s use of the N word in the video, Bec the video could have started after she mentioned that and the argument could have easily continued from there without her mentioning it again. What makes me doubt is her husband’s “not this shit again” demeanor. It’s

I agree with you in principle. Even though eating with someone else’s service animal too close to you is some bullshit, it’s reasonable to expect one to deal with it cause the owner of the service animal deserves whatever benefit that animal provides. But is every choice of service animal really reasonable? This woman

Uhmmmmmmmm,Yesha???!!? Sista???!!...Uhm, babe??!??!....BRUH!!!! Not first thing in the morning... This post almost had me cussin, at the breakfast table, surrounded by my wife and kids. WTF is wrong with this woman? I know Maury sold his soul long ago, and the depths to which his show has sunk even reflects badly on

I’m pretty sure that whatever MF reported them has convinced his or herself that they are saving taxpayers money, because of how expensive the baby’s current and ongoing care will be, Asuming the parents aren’t able to afford the care. That’s disgusting on humanitarian grounds, but it also ignores the fact that like

Why? Because the greatest advantage that racism has is it’s plausible deniability. It’s why so many white people are comfortable telling us that our actual experiences are outliers or that we are liars. As long as so many of them deny the existence of racism, despite all the evidence we present, white folks don’t need

Is moist the worst word in the English language?!!?? Hell, no! Moist yellow cake is DELICIOUS!!! *Looks up “cake” in slang dictionary* Dammit, that makes me look like a pervert AND a racist....

I’m not a fan of his, and can’t take a position either way about these allegations, but I can understand addressing them when they are in the news. I’m just not sure how this writer expects the truth to be proven - whatever it is. If he’s innocent he’s already said it, many times. No credible evidence has been

So this rich fuck is honestly claiming, thru counsel, that he shouldn’t have to liquidate assets to ‘feed his family’, cause there exists a social safety net? Odd... When I lost my job due to illness (with no health insurance), I was told I had to *sell my car* before I could get benefits. This despite the fact that

I can’t star a comment advocating murder, but I can damn sure understand why someone would feel that way, when it is quite possibly *literally* defense of self and others. I can also agree that like previous generations of black folks, I am damned sick and tired of being sick and tired. I’m fucking sick to death of

Like I want the person who’s reading comprehension somehow missed that I *NEVER* said anything about Pelosi voting on anything, anywhere in my orbit. She did not need to have the power to deny confirmation to speak critically about a prospective member of Trump’s cabinet. Nor should any Congressional norms, like

As I mentioned in my original comment, the pick that Dolt!45 used to select Gorsuch wasn’t his to begin with. While the Dems made a fuss when President Obama was denied his CONSTITUTIONALY MANDATED right to pick a SC justice and have that pick voted on, the fuss they made wasn’t nearly loud or long enough. We all knew

I have to point out again how ludicrous it is that Dems always have to be the ones reaching out, and tempering our messages, and being sure to ask perfectly nicely. I’m struggling to think of any time in the past 10-16 years when the Republicans did any of that. At some point people have to acknowledge the absolutely

I never said that his confirmation was their fault. I listed things that the Democrats let happen without nearly enough opposition. The Democrats have a very bad habit of neglecting a wide range of issues which are important to it’s most dependable constituency. Sometimes it’s because they foolishly think doing so

You are correct. Google confirms only 1 Dem actually voted to confirm Sessions. Odd that I remember it differently. Maybe I’m remembering Psudo moderate Susan Collins, who loudly supported Sessions, as a Democrat instead of a Republican? Maybe all these terrible things are jumbled up due to their chronological

I’m aware of which chamber votes to confirm, but thanks for the info... My point wasn’t that she shouldn’t have VOTED for Sessions or told her Congressional constituency not to, but that she didn’t wield her influence to otherwise oppose him.