watu
watu
watu

About the headline.

This perplexes me as well. Considering both my android and iphone using friends never talk/argue about screen size in relation to one-handed use (it's always in relation to how it feels in the hand not how well the holding hand's thumb can access the screen), and considering I've hardly -if ever- seen it after reading

And I think you -between having us believe you're either one of those clumsy people from infomercials, or the only Android phone you've ever heard of is a phablet- missed his point.

Really? There may be a lot of android phones that compete on the iPhone level (price and spec), but there are also a lot that are cheaper and simpler...

While not my thoughts entirely in the whole article, the headline sure summed up my thoughts. Thanks for the link.

But what great new features of the OS are we going to be running with this new Processor that we really need to go noticeably faster to make an upgrade worth it? My GF owns an iPhone 4 and I still can't see anything she'd be jealous of if I were to by the 5, except the bigger screen. That's a genuine question by the

Yeah that video was good and while didn't completely sell me on the phone (I'm an indecisive first time smartphone shopper), it did help remind me that there is more to a phone than screen resolution.....

...ooops, I meant "docks"....seriously I did!!!

This is a travesty!!!

Surely you'd agree that the current dock is a stupidly big size. Apple had to change this one day and that day was always going to annoy people.

Loved the fact that you posted this, but while the concept is new to me and I find it genius in its simplicity, it's actually quite easy to understand and I don't hate my brain.

Seriously, how does one navigate this damn comment system? For the first time on a phone articles, I'm seeing mature informative comments and discussion by people not acting like bickering iOS or Android fanboys, and I really want to learn about people's experiences and opinion of Windows Phone, but this comment

That's so good! Love how the two with the guns get bored. One looks away and another picks up a pebble...

...and he reads Pamela Geller.

...and that's a reasonable argument- why didn't you say that in the first place, instead of going on about how selling violence was more mature and that sex games are for jacking off (obviously!)? If I misread the point you were trying to make, then I'm sorry, but it just seemed like ramblings about how you perceive

No you idiot, he's basing it on the fact that supporters of an oppressive Syrian regime hate Al Jazeera as well!!

...in other words "I don't like sex games so good on Steam for making it harder for them to reach the mainstream gaming audience."

What we have here is a debate started by a developer of an easy to play game* who said easy modes wreck games, and carried on by Luke who has to state the obvious, which in turn attracts the "I'm a hardcore gamer who has mad skills" crowd who are so competitive they think that computer games exist solely to prove

Agreed, and for people like me who just don't get the whole Zombie thing, I'd love a Day Z type version of something like The Road. Sparse with the threat coming from other (sub)humans - AI or Human players...