waspypants
waspypants
waspypants

hello Jason Giambi.

At the end of the video, Jeremy smashes a watermelon with a sledgehammer

Ugh, like we need Rush Limbaugh to have faster Internet.

Fox News report: Obama attempting to give pedophiles and drug addicts faster internet.

Cocaine speeds things up, you can even do the rehab quicker.

On the real though, is there a way of finding this kid and getting him a video game?

nope. I live in Boston too. This is a horrible idea. let's spend the money on litterally anything else, a hospital, schools, a giant statue to bill belichick out in the harbor that everyone can see while landing at Logan. Anything is a better idea than the Olympics.

Brookline condo owner here too. I think Boston can do it and do it well. My concerns are fourfold:

Boston was never asked if they wanted this— the Boston 2024 coalition refused to hold any public meetings, and it consists largely of a construction firm and other businesses that would profit greatly. Cambridge City Council, which would need to be on board given its proximity, has already voted against this.

I don't have a problem with that. If you show up to work in a car that is worth more than 4-5 times what you make in a year then yeah, you might be into so illegal shit. Unless you inherited it of course but expect to show proof.

That's pretty fair though, since police have a much greater ability to make money by abusing their job, they also have to expect more scrutiny. He probably should have come out and told his coworkers about it when he bought it rather than waiting until they saw him driving it.

I'd be sympathetic if she had pointed at another patron's table and asked for bread rolls. The woman in this story claimed she'd eaten them before, though, and her friends said the only reason they'd come was for the "free bread." Since they got a comped appetizer that time around too, I'm actually inclined to

Because she was an ass about it. She was rude to the server as were her friends. If she'd been polite then fair enough it would be mean to laugh, but she wasn't.

"VERY allergic to gluten"

It sounds like the family here didn't call ahead to make sure there would be appropriate accommodations for their child, though, and just assumed it would be okay to have the child sit with them, which, as others have pointed out, would be a massive safety concern if they hit turbulence. It sounds like United can

So they should have bought the seat next to them, even if they are not going to use it. That's going to go over a lot better with the flight crew than "I bought a seat back there somewhere but she's going to sit up here with us". Using that messed-up logic, they might as well have just bought a ticket for her on a

The flight attendants should always show discretion and compassion when dealing with passengers but FAA rules about lap kids are likely there because of safety. Unsecured items and children become projectiles in case of turbulence. I don't know how much a flight attendant makes but I wouldn't put my job on the line

The FAA rule that states children over the age of 2 must sit in their own seat (regardless of where it was in the airplane). That is the issue—the child was over the age of 2 and therefore cannot be a lap child. It's not just about buying a ticket, it's a safety issue.

Exactly! The parents are the ones who fucked up by buying their daughter a seat in economy rather than in business with them. It's their own damn fault for being stupid AND cheap.

The family in this story is ridiculous and was asking the flight attendant to violate FAA rules. FAA rules do NOT allow "lap children" over 2- even for special needs. There IS an exception for using a non approved device on the plane for special needs- such as a special needs car seat or other medical positioner.