warriorscot
warriorscot
warriorscot

To be fair subscription services don’t bother me, there are only a handful of games I play again and again and those I do buy. But for some I will happily use a subscription service if it saves me money. I got gamepass recently because it was dirt cheap and I wanted to play outer wilds and metro exodus, both games I

Why carry two? How often do average people use a cable to do anything other than charge? The only time I ever need a cable that does data and power is if I am using a car, and even then they all do bluetooth anyway these days and it’s often just as easy or easier to connect wireless.

Not really, there is a breadth of what difficulty level means and there is a sweat spot in many games that balances the challenge with the story without being frustrating. In many respects that shows the game off for it’s best so it’s fair to make a recommendation for people to start and that can vary. For example a

As someone nearly run over by Skylines in the UK they were disturbingly common outside of Japan and driven mostly by idiots with more money than sense aka pretty much every 22 year old pilot or engineer with a taste for speed going.

Only answer that matters: Because all my joints hurt from cramming a 2m human in a seat that is too small for normal sized humans.

The buy part is the key component, you don’t charge people extra for things they can’t help, if you insist on charging tall people for more room you need to do the same for the disabled and the elderly.

I once had someone get shitty about it, as if somehow I could grow shorter mid flight.

Guy is a total asshole, but he is right, it’s a needless change to make it a gender neutral term, the English language has gendered terms and changing them isn’t really for people to just decide to do.

British law incorporates natural justice principles and always has, it’s incorrect to state that’s a derivative, while US law is based on a far older variant than present in English Law it’s not that old and while precedent and statute form a significant part they are not inviolable(at least in the correct application

It’s a natural justice principle used throughout most of the world.

Doubtful, you have no expectation of privacy in another persons home so even in one or two party consent conditions you would be in the clear.

And? People have sex, it’s probably the only thing you can guarantee almost everyone is going to do. The underlying point is that there is no intrinisic value in the data beyond the services it’s delivering to you and the training given to the software as a biproduct.

Racism is a problem everywhere, but Europeans don’t define race as black or white it is far far more nuanced and complicated. To an “American” perspective all Europeans are white, but to a European most countries have multiple races even among those that share the same skin pigment. In the most readily understood

I’m not sure it necessarily would, French Courts don’t practice the same form of law that’s common in most of the world by my recollection and don’t have the same international impact. If it was a UK court I would say it’s more of an issue as English Law is far more applicable internationally, it’s why the Australian

It looks nice, but it’s not a replacement for the Defender. Not like we all didn’t know it despite Land Rover saying otherwise. But good to know corporate sleazebags still can’t be trusted.

You must be aware you just described why a person would WANT a rental for long drives?

Then you aren’t the end user, statistics say you are an anomaly.

If you don’t have the facilities at home or work you shouldn’t buy one. I don’t think anyone is proposing that people should if they don’t have the facilities, and generally if you can’t afford the facilities you shouldn’t be spending EV money on a vehicle.

To be fair comparitively UK infrastructure is pretty good, anything big enough to be a town has at least a train service if not a good one. You don’t get that in the US and the commuter lines make UK ones feel luxurious (and short).

Seems like a smart move, the goal of internal party debates is to focus on the demographics and find the candidate most likely to win. Core issues and policy should be done well before it. It’s also not a smart topic to bring up internally when it’s a powerful tool to attack the opposition with.