Good enough for space men, good enough for me!

I agree, they are wrong. There’s a right to protest, and a freedom of assembly, but it should not be on public streets/roads. There are safer places for people to assemble. No one should be standing in streets. This is common sense. And you don’t gain public sympathy when you are preventing from getting to work,…

Oh, that’s an easy one... VF-19 Excalibur! The black 25th Anniversary Yomato version is the best.

That’s because it’s Photoshopped. Look at the shadows!

Okay, great. Thanks for the discussion.

I am talking about a utopia where rapists can’t have kids. You think rapists should be allowed to have and raise children. That’s a problem. You also think murderers should be allowed to procreate and raise a family. That’s a problem.

So you think drug dealers should be allowed to have kids? Who gets held responsible when the child gets into the drugs and overdoses? Who is held responsible when the child grows up to be another drug dealer? Who raises the child if the parents go to prison? Do you handle all the things that can go wrong? Or do…

You said: “So stop pretending like your forced sterilization program is limited to rapists amd child molestors. It also includes thieves and drug dealers.”

My grandpa used to drive at 100MPH briefly on the highway to “clean the carbon out of the carb”. That means he broke the law. I still think he made a good grandpa. Technically he was a criminal. But that’s what I mean when I say “certain” criminals.

Yes, “certain criminals” includes drug dealers. Didn’t you read what I wrote earlier about the guy who got shot during a SWAT raid? I think my responses may be too long. I’ll do shorter condensed responses from now on because you’re not reading all that I’m writing.

eu·gen·ics

I don’t want to change my answer. You’re still not catching on to the words though. I said CERTAIN. You repeated CERTAIN. I don’t think CERTAIN criminals should be allowed to have kids. Please tell me that you finally grasp this statement because I’ve repeated it like 5 times now. Do you understand what I mean…

Ahhh, I see. So you accuse me of supporting Nazism policies but not Nazism? Whatever.

Please point me to where I said I support Nazis. I never did.

My point was that North Korea has very lax laws when it comes to protecting children from pedophiles and rapists. Since you also think pedophiles and rapists should be free to raise children you actually share the same views as they do. Therefore you would fit right in.

That was my point, professor.

Okay. Then you’re in favor of allowing pedophiles to raise kids. And you’re perfectly okay with rapists being around around children. You’d fit right at home in North Korea. Congrats!

I’m all for it. Definitely. I’m surprised you’re not, but that’s why we have the issues that we have in our society. The predators have so many ignorant people supporting their rights while the victims get ignored. But to be fair I also think pedophiles and rapists should be castrated or shot, so you and I don’t…

You still never answered the questions. How do you feel about China’s birth control methods? How have you shown your disgust with them? Can you link to any articles online that you have vehemently condemned? Can you show us anything that you’ve ever said that shows us that you do actually care about how horrendous…

All right then. You’re in favor of taking half a statement and running with it. You have literally missed half the points that I’ve made. I’m not sure if you’re just skimming my responses or if you actually have very poor reading comprehension skills. Either way, you should re-read my responses so you stop saying…