If you could’ve pulled a single study why didn’t you? If it’s so easy to prove your point why keep pulling from the same shitty source? Anyone who wants to bolster their arguments would pull from data rich, multi-variant analyses instead of a single source.

Your first link has nothing to do with wait times - it has to do with life expectancy and cost.

I always find it’s the dumbest, most biased people that need to place people in a box to secure their well-being and world view. Thank you for proving me right over and over again.

Name calling, check.

Perhaps they are but it wasn’t part of the discussion nor did anyone present any studies supporting that assertion.

OECD says the data is not comparable.

It’s behind a paywall. Thus I cannot read it.

Lol. Ever wonder why you’re a fucking failure and everyone else succeeds?

Hold my beer.

I posted a reply. Unlike you I don’t revolve my life around posting ignorant shit every 2 minutes.

I did read them. How does it feel to be wrong and stupid? I’d guess it’s your normal disposition.

That’s a ranking of healthcare, not support about longer wait times.

I don’t. They made an assertion. I asked for a source. Their source was biased and subjective.

It’s interesting that of the 5 sources all are from a single group - and one is a subjective survey.

You got a source for that assertion?

Except they’re not -

Did it suck as much as it sucked for me (having watched the entire series on Netflix DVDs?)

You’re still in beginner mode.

You’re still in beginner mode.

You’re so cool. Can I be like you when you grow up?